[OPEN-ILS-DEV] Fwd: Local System Admin. - Library Settings

[Betty Ing]

Thanks for the clarification, Bill. Thanks for the suggestion, Paul.

I have a further suggestion--how about "Library and System Settings?"

In the interim, will Release 1.4 remain with "Library Settings" for
documentation purposes?

Betty

 

On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 13:01:26 -0600
 Paul Waak <ptwaak at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Feb 22, 2009, at 11:00 AM, Bill Erickson <erickson at esilibrary.com>
>  wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 1:38 PM, John Fink <john.fink at gmail.com>  
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >> From: "Betty Ing" <ingbe at univmail.cis.mcmaster.ca>
> >> To: conifer-discuss at googlegroups.com
> >> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:12:46 -0500
> >> Subject: [conifer-discuss]
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I am documenting the Local System Admin. functionality using Dwarf
> >> build-rel_1_4 and have noticed the following:
> >>
> >> Selecting Library Configuration and then the Library Settings  
> >> Editor, I
> >> see a screen with the title Organization Unit Settings. Are we
> >> standardizing on Library Settings or Organization Unit?
> >>
> >
> > Library Settings seems more staff friendly. However, Organization  
> > Unit is
> > more.. correct, since settings can be applied at all levels of the
> > organizational hierarchy, many of which would not be called a  
> > "library".
> > For what it's worth, from the developer perspective, we generally
> use
> > Organization Unit.  From the staff perspective, is it better to be
>  
> > friendly
> > or correct?
> >
> 
> Could the name of the hierarchy level be pulled and used in the
>  title?  So at ou=System, the title reads "System Settings"?
> 
> Paul Waak
> pwaak at yahoo.com
> 
> 
>