[OPEN-ILS-DEV] troubleshooting new install: grep ejabberd doesn't match example

[Thomas Berezansky]

I don't think that is a problem, our working install (of trunk, but  
shouldn't matter for this) doesn't have that in the output either. I  
think that was part of how SSL used to be handled by ejabberd.

Thomas Berezansky
Merrimack Valley Library Consortium


Quoting "Metcalf, Steve" <MetcalfS at evergreen.edu>:

> Lucid 10.04, OpenSRF 1.2.2, Evergreen 1.6.0.7
>
> On
> http://www.open-ils.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=troubleshooting:checking_fo
> r_errors there is an example of output from ps -aef | grep ejabberd that
> includes a process with the command
>
> /usr/lib/erlang/lib/ssl-3.1.1.1/priv/bin/ssl_esock
>
> There is a file with that name on the system, the version is 3.10.7, but
> I never see a process with that command in the ps output.  I only get
> the other two processes in the example.
>
> Is this a sign of something broken in the install?  I've not been able
> to get the smoke test to work and the default login and password are not
> recognized when logging in from the client.
>
> Steve Metcalf
> THE EVERGREEN STATE COLLEGE
>
>
>
>