[OPEN-ILS-DEV] ***SPAM*** Re: ***SPAM*** Google Chrome Frame

[Thomas Berezansky]

I don't know about anyone else, but I feel like putting patches over  
things is more of a problem than a solution.

Many users won't use the button, either due to being lazy, not  
trusting installing things, or not being ABLE to. Limited users on  
home computers, work machines that are locked down, etc.

Making IE support dependent on not supporting IE, basically, seems  
like the wrong approach to me. It WILL have to work without Google  
Chrome Frame for a lot of people, and not just because of those  
people's personal preferences.

Thus, I say that if you think you can get around developing for IE by  
telling people to use a different browser, even via a plugin for IE,  
then you're wrong. Full stop.

Having said that, having the patch offer a given person a one-time  
prompt that says Google Chrome Frame may improve speed and such with  
the install button, a cookie saying not to show it again if they say  
no for any reason, is perfectly fine in my eyes.

Thomas Berezansky
Merrimack Valley Library Consortium


Quoting Mike Rylander <mrylander at gmail.com>:

> Developing any complex, dynamic web application that must support
> Internet Explorer is several orders of magnitude more painful than it
> should be, or would be without IE.  If you don't think so, you're
> wrong.  Full stop.
>
> So, because IE is so broken, I'm very strongly inclined to add the
> following patch (well, a better, configurable, I18N'd version of it)
> to trunk in the near future.  What it does is, in IE, it gives the
> user a button to click which will install Google Chrome Frame.  You
> can read about it here:
>
> http://alex.dojotoolkit.org/2010/06/beta/
>
> Basically, it embeds the Google Chrome browser inside IE, and for web
> sites that know how to request it, Chrome will render the page.  This
> decreases page load time from 10s of seconds to 1s of seconds or
> better, and allows standards-based functionality to actually work.
>
> Anyway, it could be the fever making me ramble incoherently, but I
> think this may be the only thing left that can save my sanity when
> building UIs for public consumption in Evergreen and FulfILLment.
>
> This patch is against trunk, but it should apply cleanly (or very
> nearly) to 1.6 and 1.4.  If you test it out please respond to this
> thread with any feedback.
>
> --
> Mike Rylander
>  | VP, Research and Design
>  | Equinox Software, Inc. / The Evergreen Experts
>  | phone:  1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
>  | email:  miker at esilibrary.com
>  | web:  http://www.esilibrary.com
>