[OPEN-ILS-DEV] 2.1 Status and Blocking Bugs Request

[Kathy Lussier]

I don't feel like I'm in a position to say these bugs are a show stopper
since the MassLNC consortia do not currently have any libraries using EDI in
Evergreen. However, C/W MARS is planning to go live in the fall with a
number of libraries that will be expecting to use EDI. It looks like these
bugs could be a serious impediment to using EDI. I don't know that they
should block the release of 2.1, but I'm a little concerned they may
languish in the bug queue and not receive any attention for future updates
to 2.1.

Thanks,
Kathy Lussier
-------------------------------------------------------------
Kathy Lussier
Project Coordinator
Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative
(508) 756-0172
(508) 755-3721 (fax)
klussier at masslnc.org
IM: kmlussier (AOL & Yahoo)
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier
 
 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: open-ils-dev-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org 
> [mailto:open-ils-dev-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org] On 
> Behalf Of Thomas Berezansky
> Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 1:06 PM
> To: Evergreen Development Discussion
> Subject: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] 2.1 Status and Blocking Bugs Request
> 
> During the developer meeting today 2.1's status was 
> discussed. The following is what came of it:
> 
> Mike Rylander is working on a few last-minute fixes, as well 
> as creating launchpad bugs for tracking them.
> 
> EDI was discussed in that it has known issues with a lot of 
> real-world data. See bugs:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/817653
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/812593
> 
> We did not come to a consensus on whether or not these issues 
> should be blocking the release of 2.1, and opted to push that 
> question to the dev list.
> 
> Should these issues be considered blocking for 2.1's release?
> 
> In addition, are there any other outstanding issues that 
> anyone feels should be blocking 2.1?
> 
> Outside of that, the upgrade script will need a final review, 
> after which it appears we would like to officially release 
> 2.1.0, rather than another release candidate.
> 
> Thomas Berezansky
> Merrimack Valley Library Consortium
> 
> 
> 
> 
>