[OPEN-ILS-DEV] Monograph Parts

[Hardy, Elaine]

I haven't found any REQ that addresses parts with the specificity you
probably would like to see.

Generally, I would ask that the UI for both staff and patrons be
straightforward and unambiguous, so that both groups have ease of use and
understanding both of the process and any error messages that might result
from their actions. And that it not negatively impact workflow for
catalogers.

If you need something more specific, let me know and I will see if I can
get something written up. Having the ability to place true volume level
holds (meaning a hold across all vol x attached to a bib record) will be
very helpful to all users.

Elaine
 
 
J. Elaine Hardy
PINES Bibliographic Projects and Metadata Manager
Georgia Public Library Service,
A Unit of the University System of Georgia
1800 Century Place, Suite 150
Atlanta, Ga. 30345-4304
404.235-7128
404.235-7201, fax
 
ehardy at georgialibraries.org
www.georgialibraries.org
http://www.georgialibraries.org/pines/


-----Original Message-----
From: open-ils-dev-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org
[mailto:open-ils-dev-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Mike
Rylander
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 4:06 PM
To: Evergreen Development Discussion List
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] Monograph Parts

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Hardy, Elaine
<ehardy at georgialibraries.org> wrote:
> Dan -- I think it would be beneficial to allow a complete set to be
> available to be targeted for a hold placed for a specific volume. But,
> I don’t know that I would put that as a priority 1 if I were doing a
> requirements doc for this.
>
> Mike -- lf there is still time, I will look through the req doc we are
> developing for a cataloging module and see if there is anything in it
> that might be useful for this or bound with. We put writing the doc on
> hiatus in August and am just know dusting it back off again, so I
> don't recall if we addresses these two yet.
>

There is some time.  I'm stabilizing the backend code an will be moving to
UIs, but until this gets integrated into the mainline repo we can change
details relatively easily.  Thanks in advance!

--miker

> Elaine
>
>
> J. Elaine Hardy
> PINES Bibliographic Projects and Metadata Manager Georgia Public
> Library Service, A Unit of the University System of Georgia
> 1800 Century Place, Suite 150
> Atlanta, Ga. 30345-4304
> 404.235-7128
> 404.235-7201, fax
>
> ehardy at georgialibraries.org
> www.georgialibraries.org
> http://www.georgialibraries.org/pines/
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: open-ils-dev-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org
> [mailto:open-ils-dev-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of
> Dan Wells
> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 4:44 PM
> To: Evergreen Development Discussion List
> Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] Monograph Parts
>
> Hello Mike,
>
> Also, I think this quote from Elaine deserves a bit more attention:
>
>>> I'm particularly interested in how this would function in a
>>> consortium like PINES where different libraries might process a
>>> multipart set differently. For example, one library might process
>>> and circulate a 3 part DVD set as one item, where another might put
>>> each in a separate container with a separate barcode.
>
> If we want the complete-set copy from Library A to conclusively
> fulfill a P-level hold from Library B, we will want to allow multiple
parts per copy.
> Or am I missing something?
>
>



--
Mike Rylander
 | VP, Research and Design
 | Equinox Software, Inc. / The Evergreen Experts
 | phone:  1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
 | email:  miker at esilibrary.com
 | web:  http://www.esilibrary.com