[OPEN-ILS-DEV] After 2.2 naming / schedule

[Jason Stephenson]

Quoting Bill Erickson <erickson at esilibrary.com>:

> 1. Is it time to jump to 3.0 or do we stay with 2.3?
>
> 2. Do we return to the originally proposed March/September release schedule?
>

I vote "yes" on 2, and "yes, sort of 1."

My inclination is to go with a version numbering scheme identical to  
what Ubuntu does with their timed releases. That is, we should use  
YY.MM for the "version" numbers. Thus, if we keep to a Marc/September  
schedule, then the September release would be 12.09.

I think the above makes as much sense, if not more, as anything else,  
since version numbering schemes are all arbitrary.

-- 
Jason Stephenson
Assistant Director for Technology Services
Merrimack Valley Library Consortium
Chief Bug Wrangler, Evergreen ILS