[OPEN-ILS-DEV] After 2.2 naming / schedule

[Kathy Lussier]

>>Any particular reasons for the March/September release schedule versus
>>any other months?

There was a bit of explanation for why those two months were chosen when the
End of Life policy was announced in December -
http://markmail.org/message/regauiczh6a3e2ro.

I support continuing with the March/September release schedules. 

I have no opinion on version numbering.

kathy

-------------------------------------------------------------
Kathy Lussier
Project Coordinator
Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative
(508) 756-0172
(508) 755-3721 (fax)
klussier at masslnc.org
IM: kmlussier (AOL & Yahoo)
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier
 
 

>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: open-ils-dev-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org [mailto:open-ils-
>>dev-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Lazar, Alexey
>>Vladimirovich
>>Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 12:42 PM
>>To: Evergreen Development Discussion List
>>Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] After 2.2 naming / schedule
>>
>>Any particular reasons for the March/September release schedule versus
>>any other months?
>>
>>As far as versions, are there known pros and cons for either scheme? Is
>>anything wrong with the current scheme?
>>
>>Alexey Lazar
>>PALS
>>Information System Developer and Integrator
>>507-389-2907
>>http://www.mnpals.org/
>>
>>On May 15, 2012, at 10:46 , Bill Erickson wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> As we look toward planning the next release of Evergreen (after 2.2),
>>there are a couple of simple, but important questions we need to
>>answer.
>>>
>>> 1. Is it time to jump to 3.0 or do we stay with 2.3?
>>>
>>> I'm not aware of any significant architectural changes (e.g. changing
>>PG versions) on the horizon, which would suggest we stick with 2.3.
>>Perhaps it's too early to tell?
>>>
>>> For reference: http://evergreen-
>>ils.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=versioning
>>>
>>> 2. Do we return to the originally proposed March/September release
>>schedule?
>>>
>>> My impression is there's a general consensus to do this.  It would
>>lead to a shortened development cycle for next release, so I would like
>>to give everyone a chance to voice their concerns / alternate
>>suggestions and put this to a vote.
>>>
>>> Once we have these questions answered, we can start outlining a
>>schedule.
>>>
>>> Thanks everyone.
>>>
>>> -b
>>>
>>> --
>>> Bill Erickson
>>> | Senior Software Developer
>>> | Equinox Software, Inc. / Your Library's Guide to Open Source
>>> | phone: 877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
>>> | email: erickson at esilibrary.com
>>> | web: http://esilibrary.com