[OPEN-ILS-DEV] After 2.2 naming / schedule

[Anoop Atre]

To add to the thread Kathy posted, this has a few more responses 
attached towards the end.

+1 March/September release schedule

No opinion on version numbering.

http://georgialibraries.markmail.org/message/2ofnmjgoku4zeng2

On 05/15/2012 12:51 PM, Kathy Lussier wrote:
>>> Any particular reasons for the March/September release schedule versus
>>> any other months?
>
> There was a bit of explanation for why those two months were chosen when the
> End of Life policy was announced in December -
> http://markmail.org/message/regauiczh6a3e2ro.
>
> I support continuing with the March/September release schedules.
>
> I have no opinion on version numbering.
>
> kathy
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> Kathy Lussier
> Project Coordinator
> Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative
> (508) 756-0172
> (508) 755-3721 (fax)
> klussier at masslnc.org
> IM: kmlussier (AOL&  Yahoo)
> Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier
>
>
>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: open-ils-dev-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org [mailto:open-ils-
>>> dev-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Lazar, Alexey
>>> Vladimirovich
>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 12:42 PM
>>> To: Evergreen Development Discussion List
>>> Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] After 2.2 naming / schedule
>>>
>>> Any particular reasons for the March/September release schedule versus
>>> any other months?
>>>
>>> As far as versions, are there known pros and cons for either scheme? Is
>>> anything wrong with the current scheme?
>>>
>>> Alexey Lazar
>>> PALS
>>> Information System Developer and Integrator
>>> 507-389-2907
>>> http://www.mnpals.org/
>>>
>>> On May 15, 2012, at 10:46 , Bill Erickson wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> As we look toward planning the next release of Evergreen (after 2.2),
>>> there are a couple of simple, but important questions we need to
>>> answer.
>>>>
>>>> 1. Is it time to jump to 3.0 or do we stay with 2.3?
>>>>
>>>> I'm not aware of any significant architectural changes (e.g. changing
>>> PG versions) on the horizon, which would suggest we stick with 2.3.
>>> Perhaps it's too early to tell?
>>>>
>>>> For reference: http://evergreen-
>>> ils.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=versioning
>>>>
>>>> 2. Do we return to the originally proposed March/September release
>>> schedule?
>>>>
>>>> My impression is there's a general consensus to do this.  It would
>>> lead to a shortened development cycle for next release, so I would like
>>> to give everyone a chance to voice their concerns / alternate
>>> suggestions and put this to a vote.
>>>>
>>>> Once we have these questions answered, we can start outlining a
>>> schedule.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks everyone.
>>>>
>>>> -b
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Bill Erickson
>>>> | Senior Software Developer
>>>> | Equinox Software, Inc. / Your Library's Guide to Open Source
>>>> | phone: 877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
>>>> | email: erickson at esilibrary.com
>>>> | web: http://esilibrary.com
>
>

-- 
--
Anoop Atre
| Systems Administrator
| aatre at esilibrary.com
| 770-709-5595
Equinox Software Inc. / Your Library's Guide to Open Source
--
   "Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens"
    ~ Johann Christoph Friedrich von Schiller