[OPEN-ILS-DEV] After 2.2 naming / schedule

[Lazar, Alexey Vladimirovich]

Very good.  Thanks, Anoop, Kathy and Jason, exactly the info I needed to understand. +1 on schedule, makes sense.

Alexey Lazar
PALS
Information System Developer and Integrator
507-389-2907
http://www.mnpals.org/

On May 15, 2012, at 12:11 , Anoop Atre wrote:

> To add to the thread Kathy posted, this has a few more responses attached towards the end.
> 
> +1 March/September release schedule
> 
> No opinion on version numbering.
> 
> http://georgialibraries.markmail.org/message/2ofnmjgoku4zeng2
> 
> On 05/15/2012 12:51 PM, Kathy Lussier wrote:
>>>> Any particular reasons for the March/September release schedule versus
>>>> any other months?
>> 
>> There was a bit of explanation for why those two months were chosen when the
>> End of Life policy was announced in December -
>> http://markmail.org/message/regauiczh6a3e2ro.
>> 
>> I support continuing with the March/September release schedules.
>> 
>> I have no opinion on version numbering.
>> 
>> kathy
>> 
>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>> Kathy Lussier
>> Project Coordinator
>> Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative
>> (508) 756-0172
>> (508) 755-3721 (fax)
>> klussier at masslnc.org
>> IM: kmlussier (AOL&  Yahoo)
>> Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: open-ils-dev-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org [mailto:open-ils-
>>>> dev-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Lazar, Alexey
>>>> Vladimirovich
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 12:42 PM
>>>> To: Evergreen Development Discussion List
>>>> Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] After 2.2 naming / schedule
>>>> 
>>>> Any particular reasons for the March/September release schedule versus
>>>> any other months?
>>>> 
>>>> As far as versions, are there known pros and cons for either scheme? Is
>>>> anything wrong with the current scheme?
>>>> 
>>>> Alexey Lazar
>>>> PALS
>>>> Information System Developer and Integrator
>>>> 507-389-2907
>>>> http://www.mnpals.org/
>>>> 
>>>> On May 15, 2012, at 10:46 , Bill Erickson wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>> 
>>>>> As we look toward planning the next release of Evergreen (after 2.2),
>>>> there are a couple of simple, but important questions we need to
>>>> answer.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 1. Is it time to jump to 3.0 or do we stay with 2.3?
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'm not aware of any significant architectural changes (e.g. changing
>>>> PG versions) on the horizon, which would suggest we stick with 2.3.
>>>> Perhaps it's too early to tell?
>>>>> 
>>>>> For reference: http://evergreen-
>>>> ils.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=versioning
>>>>> 
>>>>> 2. Do we return to the originally proposed March/September release
>>>> schedule?
>>>>> 
>>>>> My impression is there's a general consensus to do this.  It would
>>>> lead to a shortened development cycle for next release, so I would like
>>>> to give everyone a chance to voice their concerns / alternate
>>>> suggestions and put this to a vote.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Once we have these questions answered, we can start outlining a
>>>> schedule.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks everyone.
>>>>> 
>>>>> -b
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Bill Erickson
>>>>> | Senior Software Developer
>>>>> | Equinox Software, Inc. / Your Library's Guide to Open Source
>>>>> | phone: 877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
>>>>> | email: erickson at esilibrary.com
>>>>> | web: http://esilibrary.com
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> --
> Anoop Atre
> | Systems Administrator
> | aatre at esilibrary.com
> | 770-709-5595
> Equinox Software Inc. / Your Library's Guide to Open Source
> --
>  "Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens"
>   ~ Johann Christoph Friedrich von Schiller