[OPEN-ILS-DEV] Server Monitoring

[David Busby]

Icinga is a fork, you will likely not notice a difference unless you dig
around in the guts or try to build a distributed monitoring solution. I've
used both but currently run with a home-grown solution.
On Nov 5, 2012 8:11 AM, "Peters, Michael" <MRPeters at library.in.gov> wrote:

> Nagios, for sure.  Couldn’t live without it.****
>
> ** **
>
> -Mike****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* open-ils-dev-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org [mailto:
> open-ils-dev-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org] *On Behalf Of *Duimovich,
> George
> *Sent:* Monday, November 05, 2012 10:49 AM
> *To:* Evergreen Development Discussion List
> *Subject:* [OPEN-ILS-DEV] Server Monitoring****
>
> ** **
>
> Hello all,****
>
>  ****
>
> Is it correct to assume that Nagios remains the most frequently used
> server monitoring plug-in, or is there any move in the works with some
> sites to use something new / other alternatives.****
>
>  ****
>
> IIRC ESI's nagios plug-in remains the best option, correct?****
>
>  ****
>
> George****
>
>  ****
>
> George Duimovich****
>
> NRCan Library / Bibliothèque de RNCan****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://libmail.georgialibraries.org/pipermail/open-ils-dev/attachments/20121105/311391b3/attachment-0001.htm>