[OPEN-ILS-DEV] Server Monitoring

[Duimovich, George]

Thanks all for your feedback.

George

________________________________
From: open-ils-dev-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org [mailto:open-ils-dev-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of David Busby
Sent: November 5, 2012 11:14
To: Evergreen Development Discussion List
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] Server Monitoring


Icinga is a fork, you will likely not notice a difference unless you dig around in the guts or try to build a distributed monitoring solution. I've used both but currently run with a home-grown solution.

On Nov 5, 2012 8:11 AM, "Peters, Michael" <MRPeters at library.in.gov<mailto:MRPeters at library.in.gov>> wrote:
Nagios, for sure.  Couldn't live without it.

-Mike

From: open-ils-dev-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org<mailto:open-ils-dev-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org> [mailto:open-ils-dev-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org<mailto:open-ils-dev-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org>] On Behalf Of Duimovich, George
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2012 10:49 AM
To: Evergreen Development Discussion List
Subject: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] Server Monitoring

Hello all,

Is it correct to assume that Nagios remains the most frequently used server monitoring plug-in, or is there any move in the works with some sites to use something new / other alternatives.

IIRC ESI's nagios plug-in remains the best option, correct?

George

George Duimovich
NRCan Library / Bibliothèque de RNCan



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://libmail.georgialibraries.org/pipermail/open-ils-dev/attachments/20121106/3da6a9ce/attachment.htm>