[OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION] A simple sys-admin doc addition.
Soulliere, Robert
robert.soulliere at mohawkcollege.ca
Wed Sep 15 13:26:53 EDT 2010
I was definitely going to separate 1.6 and 2.0 and we are going to separate the branches based on version. I was mostly wondering ff the content changes between 1.6.0 and 1.6.1 were drastic enough to separate.
Thanks,
Robert
________________________________________
From: open-ils-documentation-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org [open-ils-documentation-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Galen Charlton [gmc at esilibrary.com]
Sent: September 15, 2010 1:26 PM
To: Documentation discussion for Evergreen software
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION] A simple sys-admin doc addition.
Hi,
On Sep 15, 2010, at 1:02 PM, Soulliere, Robert wrote:
> I did have a question as to whether we wanted to separate 1.6.0 and 1.6.1 into 2 versions of the documentation or keep them in the same manual version with notes regarding features specific to 1.6.1? I am not quite sure about the implications of doing it either way in regards to merging changes to these documents across branches in the repository.
Since, roughly speaking, the documentation for 1.6.1 would be the 1.6.0 documentation plus a chapter on booking, keeping them together would be OK if it is more convenient for DIG. However, that wouldn't work for 2.0, since there will be a long period of time where some libraries will be running 1.6.x and others 2.x, so separate versions of the manuals would be a good thing.
Of course, multiple versions can be maintained in the same Git repository using different branches.
Regards,
Galen
--
Galen Charlton
VP, Data Services
Equinox Software, Inc. / Your Library's Guide to Open Source
email: gmc at esilibrary.com
direct: +1 352-215-7548
skype: gmcharlt
web: http://www.esilibrary.com/
_______________________________________________
OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION mailing list
OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION at list.georgialibraries.org
http://list.georgialibraries.org/mailman/listinfo/open-ils-documentation
This E-mail contains privileged and confidential information intended
only for the individual or entity named in the message. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible
to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication
is prohibited. If this communication was received in error, please
notify the sender by reply E-mail immediately, and delete and destroy
the original message.
More information about the OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION
mailing list