[OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION] Documentation for Adding Holdings with Monograph Parts

[sarahc at zionsville.lib.in.us]

Thanks, Mike!


Sarah Childs
Senior Cataloger
Hussey-Mayfield Memorial Public Library
250 North Fifth Street
Zionsville, IN 46077
317-873-3149 x13330
sarahc at zionsville.lib.in.us



> Kathy and Sarah,
>
> I've updated the Monograph Parts documentation linked from
> http://www.esilibrary.com/esi/availableDocs.php to include a list
> of
> the permissions required.  Feel free to simply use the updated
> doc.
>
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 6:28 AM, Kathy Lussier
> <klussier at masslnc.org> wrote:
>> Hi Sarah,
>>
>>
>>> It says "No new permissions or administrative settings are
>>> needed
>>> to use this feature." Maybe they don't have to be "created,"
>>> but
>>> we found that new permissions had to be added to the Cat 1
>>> log-ins
>>> in order for cataloging staff in Indiana to use this feature.
>>>  And
>>> of course there are different levels of permissions:
>>> Consortial,
>>> Local System and Branch.  It would be nice if documentation
>>> addressed this, and what affect adding permissions at the
>>> different levels will have.
>>
>>
>> You're right, and I missed that piece when I was reviewing the
>> documentation.
>>
>> There are three permissions we needed to give catalogers -
>> CREATE_MONOGRAPH_PART, UPDATE_MONOGRAPH_PART
>> DELETE_MONOGRAPH_PART - and,
>> since a part is shared by all libraries in the consortium, they
>> needed to be
>> applied at the consortial level. This sentence should probably
>> be replaced
>> with:
>>
>> "The CREATE_MONOGRAPH_PART, UPDATE_MONOGRAPH_PART and
>> DELETE_MONOGRAPH_PART
>> permissions need to be applied at the consortial level to use
>> this feature."
>>
>> Robert, what is the best way to update the community docs with
>> that
>> information? Should I be submitting a bug through Launchpad?
>>
>>
>>> Also, the documentation only addresses applying parts when
>>> creating new volumes. Is that the only way to apply parts? I
>>> have
>>> tons and tons of existing items where I'd like to apply parts.
>>> Currently I have to delete and re-add to do so?
>>
>>
>> You can add a part to an existing item by using the "replace
>> barcode" option
>> from holdings maintenance. When using the unified copy/volume
>> editor, you
>> can also add/edit a part by selecting "edit items."
>>
>> This is something that should probably be incorporated into the
>> documentation for "Using the Copy Editor to Make Changes." In
>> looking at the
>> 2.1 documentation outline -
>> http://evergreen-ils.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=evergreen-docs_2.1:outline
>> -
>> it looks like we're still looking for a volunteer to create
>> those docs.
>>
>> Thanks for reporting these issues Sarah!
>>
>> Kathy Lussier
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>> Kathy Lussier
>> Project Coordinator
>> Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative
>> (508) 756-0172
>> (508) 755-3721 (fax)
>> klussier at masslnc.org
>> IM: kmlussier (AOL & Yahoo)
>> Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sarah Childs
>>> Senior Cataloger
>>> Hussey-Mayfield Memorial Public Library
>>> 250 North Fifth Street
>>> Zionsville, IN 46077
>>> 317-873-3149 x13330
>>> sarahc at zionsville.lib.in.us
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION mailing list
>>> OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION at list.georgialibraries.org
>>> http://list.georgialibraries.org/mailman/listinfo/open-ils-documentation
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION mailing list
>> OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION at list.georgialibraries.org
>> http://list.georgialibraries.org/mailman/listinfo/open-ils-documentation
>
>
>
> --
> Mike Rylander
>  | Director of Research and Development
>  | Equinox Software, Inc. / Your Library's Guide to Open Source
>  | phone:  1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
>  | email:  miker at esilibrary.com
>  | web:  http://www.esilibrary.com
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>