[OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION] Updating Attributions

Lori Bowen Ayre lori.ayre at galecia.com
Tue May 17 17:43:08 EDT 2011


Thanks for the clarification Jason...and I hate to be known as someone who
puts one in an anal retentive/pedantic mindset!

Shall I get a copy of the KCLS Acq documentation that has a CC-SA license
then?  I doubt there's had any copyright statement on it.

Lori

On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Jason Etheridge <jason at esilibrary.com>wrote:

> <snip>
> > giving them an opportunity to withhold their consent to an explicit
> > license going forward, I think we're on reasonably good ground.
>
> Oh, I do too.  Lori just put me in an anal retentive/pedantic mindset
> with talk of unlicensed material.
>
> > So are you genuinely worried about
> > the risk of legal proceedings, or is something else bothering you and
> > this side thread is just the symptom?
>
> No, no worries.  Intellectual "property" discussions tweak my brain.
> I personally think the whole thing is out of balance and the public is
> at risk of being catapulted off the scales.  And that lawyers beget
> more lawyers.
>
> But I also work for and have interest in a company that has a more
> melded view of such things.
>
> > We seem to have quickly veered off
> > your original question, which was about providing explicit attribution
> > for large works that were incorporated into the documentation.
>
> Right.  Veering back toward pedantic and away from kumbayah, I'm going
> to focus on acquisitions documentation.  There's a document on the
> wiki titled "The Acquisitions Module Evergreen Release 2.0.0".  It has
> an explicit license:
>
> This manual is licensed under the Creative Commons,
> Attribution-Share-Alike license.  This document was created by Equinox
> Software, Inc. with funding provided by Georgia Public Library
> Service.  Any reproductions or adaptations must attribute original
> creation of this work to Equinox Software, Inc. and Georgia Public
> Library Service.  Any reproductions or adaptations must be distributed
> under the same or a similar license.
>
> This document was placed wholesale within the Evergreen documentation,
> which of course, was the intention.  The original issue was that the
> license was not being met.  The Evergreen documentation merely had a
> Copyright (C) The Evergreen Project, which is a non-legal entity
> similar to the PostgreSQL Global Development Group.  There was also a
> list of participants.
>
> What is happening now (or what I'd like to continue seeing) is some
> dialog on how to best fulfill the CC-BY-SA licenses of external
> sources that we integrate into the Evergreen documentation.
>
> In the development community this is easy for us, as attribution is an
> optional term for the GPL license, and credit for work is easily
> determined.  It seems sensible for similar contributions to the
> documentation to work with the same sort of no-barrier record keeping.
>  But it seems different to me if you're integrating someone else's
> work, however licensed.
>
> Before git made it easy for us, I made sure to credit tsbere for any
> patch he contributed that I committed.  Everyone else does similarly.
> But with documentation, we weren't doing that, and the material is
> shared under a license which explicitly cares about attribution.
>
> <re-licensing>
> > What are you going to do to help resolve this issue?
>
> I'm going to forget about it. :-)
>
> --
> Jason Etheridge
>  | VP, Tactical Development
>  | Equinox Software, Inc. / Your Library's Guide to Open Source
>  | phone:  1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
>  | email:  jason at esilibrary.com
>  | web:  http://www.esilibrary.com
> _______________________________________________
> OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION mailing list
> OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION at list.georgialibraries.org
> http://list.georgialibraries.org/mailman/listinfo/open-ils-documentation
>



-- 

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Lori Bowen Ayre // Library Technology Consultant
The Galecia Group // www.galecia.com
(707) 763-6869 // Lori.Ayre at galecia.com

<Lori.Ayre at galecia.com>Specializing in open source ILS solutions, RFID,
filtering,
workflow optimization, and materials handling
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://list.georgialibraries.org/pipermail/open-ils-documentation/attachments/20110517/137dfbb6/attachment.htm 


More information about the OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION mailing list