[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] strange behavior during record update

[Dan Scott]

This bug is fixed as of last night (thanks miker!); it will show up in
the next 1.4 release. There are a few more bugs that we're working on
before that next release will be cut.

If you want to apply the fix for the problem right away to your 1.4
install, you can:

1. download the latest version of Cat.pm
(http://svn.open-ils.org/trac/ILS/browser/branches/rel_1_4_0/Open-ILS/src/perlmods/OpenILS/Application/Cat.pm?rev=12435)
2. copy it over your existing version of the file in in
/openils/lib/perl5/OpenILS/Application/
3. restart the Perl services

Thanks again for the bug report, Tigran.

(Oh, and Jason fixed my fix for the "Record 1 of 0" annoyance... heh).

Dan

2009/3/5 Dan Scott <denials at gmail.com>:
> Hi Tigran:
>
> These are the same problems that I have reported in bug #47
> (http://svn.open-ils.org/trac/ILS/ticket/47) - I don't know of any way
> around the problem, other than to restart the OpenSRF services every
> time you want to edit an existing bibliographic record. Which is, of
> course, completely unworkable. Essentially, this makes the 1.4 release
> currently unusable.
>
> On the bright side, I did commit a fix for the "Record 1 of 0"
> annoyance last night. :-/
>
> Dan
>
> 2009/3/5 Tigran Zargaryan <tigran at flib.sci.am>:
>> Hello Jason,
>> we have drooped the database to the initial status, and started the new
>> cataloging.
>> Here is the picture.
>> 1. For the first record we have done full bibl. level description and have
>> added the holdings data. This record is being saved and displayed in a
>> normal way. After that I have started to do the changes using 'MARC Edit'.
>> First time update on the fields for the Author, Title, etc are going normal,
>> and the system is saving all the changes.
>> 2. When I am starting to update the same fields for the first record second
>> time, the system is not saving that changes.
>> 3. I am creating another bibl. record (with holding information).
>> For this and other records no any changes are being saved, although the
>> system is replying that the Changes are saved.
>>
>> So I can create the new records without problems. When trying to update the
>> field content, the system is not saving the changes.
>> Any ideas what to do?
>> thanks,
>> Tigran
>>
>> Jason Etheridge wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Why when I am having more that one Bib. records in my database, my
>>>> changes are not being saved?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I think Dan noticed the same bug.  Does it seem to make a difference
>>> if you have items attached to the records being edited?
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I noticed that when viewing the record, on the top left side of the
>>>> screen the system is displaying 'Record 1 of 0', which I guess is something
>>>> abnormal.(see attached image).
>>>>
>>>
>>> This is just a harmless cosmetic bug you can ignore, unrelated to your
>>> main issue.
>>>
>>>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database:
>>> 270.11.6/1980 - Release Date: 03/02/09 23:02:00
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dr. Tigran Zargaryan
>> Director
>> Fundamental Scientific Library
>> Academy of the Sciences
>> Republic of Armenia
>> Baghramyan ave., 24D
>> 0019, Armenia
>> Yerevan
>> T. +37410 524750
>> F. +37410 524750
>> URL: http://www.flib.sci.am
>> e-mail: tigran at flib.sci.am
>> Google talk: tigran at flib.sci.am
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Dan Scott
> Laurentian University
>



-- 
Dan Scott
Laurentian University