[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] EvergreenIntConf 2010 - Reports round-table

[OdonLibrarian at aol.com]

In a message dated 4/20/2010 5:10:23 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
gtuttle at prlib.org writes:

The  quickest way to evaluate a report is through consensus. Through
consensus,  one can often forego the testing process -- instead, you say, if
the report  is good enough for that library consortium, it is good enough 
for
my  library consortium. 




***Good theory, but I haven't found it to hold up in  practice.  Sometimes 
the consortium as a whole is struggling with  reports.  Other times a 
particular set of libraries has chosen to  use options that may be meaningless in 
another setting.
 
Marsha
 
Marsha  Lynn
Director
Odon Winkelpleck Public  Library
812-636-4949
OdonLibrarian at aol.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://libmail.georgialibraries.org/pipermail/open-ils-general/attachments/20100421/6f80dabc/attachment.htm