[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] ***SPAM*** RE: Details of fiscal sponsorship agreement for Evergreen & Conservancy

[Anoop Atre]

+1

Speaking ONLY as a community member I also support going ahead with the SFC.

Also agree with Dan that a smaller subset of the governance committee be 
elected to represent.

 > To respond to your question about who would represent the Evergreen
 > project to the Conservancy, I personally think the entire interim
 > governance committee (20-ish people) would be way too unwieldy for
 > that role. One way of moving forward would be for the interim
 > governance committee to elect a subset (1, 3, 5, 7?) to act as
 > contacts with the Conservancy, as directed by the community via the
 > interim governance committee. We're probably not talking about many
 > actions in the short term, as we don't really have much in the way of
 > funds to direct (carry-overs from previous conferences to the next
 > conference, domain name renewals) and I'm not aware of any pending
 > legal actions. (Knock on wood!)


"Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens"
  ~ Johann Christoph Friedrich von Schiller