[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] OPAC Holdings display in 2.1?

[Kathy Lussier]

Are you referring to the sorting on the search results page? If so, I
*think* it is sorting by call number (at least, that's what I've been able
to determine when looking at it.) 

MassLNC has recently been working with Dan Scott on development for Template
Toolkit to improve the way local holdings display in a consortial
environment - you can see our general requirements at
http://masslnc.cwmars.org/node/2436. As part of these requirements, we asked
to change the sorting on the search results page to go by library name. It
doesn't help you for 2.1, but it's definitely a direction we would like to
go in for the future.

Kathy

-------------------------------------------------------------
Kathy Lussier
Project Coordinator
Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative
(508) 756-0172
(508) 755-3721 (fax)
klussier at masslnc.org
IM: kmlussier (AOL & Yahoo)
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier
 
 

>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: open-ils-general-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org [mailto:open-
>>ils-general-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Rogan Hamby
>>Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 1:58 PM
>>To: Evergreen Discussion Group
>>Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] OPAC Holdings display in 2.1?
>>
>>The random display is something we in SC LENDS have noticed as well
>>though we haven't gotten around to documenting and testing thoroughly
>>yet (higher priorities and all that).  I can say that I've seen it
>>across sorting types, org units, etc..
>>--
>>
>>
>>Rogan Hamby
>>
>>Director of Information Technology & Innovation
>>
>>Director of SC LENDS
>>
>>South Carolina State Library
>>
>>1500 Senate St., Columbia SC 29211
>>
>>803.734.8651 | Fax 803.734.4757
>>
>>
>>
>>www.statelibrary.sc.gov <http://www.statelibrary.sc.gov/>
>>
>>sclends.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>The South Carolina State Library is a national model for innovation,
>>collaboration, leadership and effectiveness. It is the keystone in
>>South Carolina's intellectual landscape.
>>
>>
>>From: "Hardy, Elaine" <ehardy at georgialibraries.org>
>>Reply-To: Evergreen Discussion Group <open-ils-
>>general at list.georgialibraries.org>
>>Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 13:46:00 -0500
>>To: Evergreen Discussion Group <open-ils-
>>general at list.georgialibraries.org>
>>Subject: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] OPAC Holdings display in 2.1?
>>
>>
>>
>>During our testing  of 2.1, a question about the order of the holdings
>>display in the OPAC view when searching all of the PINES consortium has
>>arisen. We thought it was alphabetical by owning system, then noticed
>>that some item statuses seem to not display (in process for example).
>>Now we are seeing what appears to be random display order in some
>>searches. We do love the display (especially when a specific system is
>>targeted for search), and are just curious if there is an expected
>>order.
>>
>>
>>
>>Elaine
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>J. Elaine Hardy
>>
>>PINES Bibliographic Projects and Metadata Manager
>>
>>Georgia Public Library Service,
>>
>>A Unit of the University System of Georgia
>>
>>1800 Century Place, Suite 150
>>
>>Atlanta, Ga. 30345-4304
>>
>>404.235-7128
>>
>>404.235-7201, fax
>>
>>
>>
>>ehardy at georgialibraries.org <mailto:ehardy at georgialibraries.org>
>>
>>www.georgialibraries.org <http://www.georgialibraries.org/>
>>
>>http://www.georgialibraries.org/pines/
>><http://www.georgialibraries.org/pines/>
>>
>>