[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Acquisitions Permission Issue
Christine Morgan
cmorgan at noblenet.org
Thu Jun 30 11:54:36 EDT 2011
Hi Tim,
I've set up a permissions group that mimics yours on our 2.0.6 test
installation. Only the permissions unique to 2.1 are missing. I am not
seeing the problem you are seeing. When I log in as a Wakefield user
with the permission group assigned, I only see providers for Wakefield.
When I login as a Beverly user with the permission group assigned, I
only see providers for Beverly. When I log in as an administrator, I see
all providers.
Is there anything else I can test for you?
Christine
On 6/29/2011 3:54 PM, Tim Spindler wrote:
> I posted this a long time ago and put in a bug report. Since I have
> never really gotten a response and was just talking to Tom Berezansky
> about this (who unfortunately couldn't help much because they aren't
> currently using acquistions) but this is the problems.
>
> With "manage providers" and "admin providers" set at system org unit
> type, we are not seeing any providers but if any of them are set at
> consortium level, we see everyone's providers. I have seen this on
> 2.01, and we are currently running 2.1 beta.
>
> Below are the permissions I was trying to use for acquisitions
> administrator. Even if others could reproduce this issue it would be
> helpful to know if it is truly a bug or there is a problem with my
> permission setup. (see google doc of our set up here
> *http://tinyurl.com/3q7wajw*)
>
> --
> Tim Spindler
> tjspindler at gmail.com <mailto:tjspindler at gmail.com>
>
> *P** Go Green - **Save a tree! Please don't print this e-mail unless
> it's really necessary.*
>
>
--
Christine Morgan
Database Assistant
North of Boston Library Exchange, Inc.
Danvers, Massachusetts
cmorgan at noblenet.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://libmail.georgialibraries.org/pipermail/open-ils-general/attachments/20110630/503b58ad/attachment.htm>
More information about the Open-ils-general
mailing list