[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] ***SPAM*** Re: Printing in Evergreen

[Ben Shum]

For whatever it's worth, based on Dan's advice a couple years ago, our 
libraries also use the Dymo 450 for spine label printing.  We ran 
Evergreen 2.0 from 2.0.1 through 2.0.10-ish before we upgraded to 2.2 
and beyond.  As Dan notes, those printer setting options do exist in 2.0.

So, safe to say that model works with Evergreen 2.0.

-- Ben

On 08/07/2012 06:39 PM, Dan Scott wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 03:34:10PM -0700, Christine Campbell wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Dan Scott <dan at coffeecode.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 02:40:20PM -0700, Christine Campbell wrote:
>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>
>>>> I should have also specified that I'm looking for information about spine
>>>> label printing in particular.
>>> So, to reiterate, yes we are printing _spine_ labels successfully on Dymo
>>> 450's (and 330's) with the stock Evergreen software, and have been since
>>> we migrated to Evergreen in 2009.
>>>
>>> I can also state that we have the ability to modify the font family,
>>> font weight, font size, etc, through the Library Settings Editor, with a
>>> small caveat that it seems as though a setting at the Consortial context
>>> currently overrides any settings at child systems or branches (which is
>>> counter to how it is supposed to work, so quite possibly a bug there).
>>>
>>> We are running on the 2.3 release branch of Evergreen as of Sunday,
>>> although prior to that we were running on the 2.1 branch, and the same
>>> functionality was present there.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks so much, Dan. Your experiences seem likely to save the rest of us a
>> lot of experimenting.
> No problem, Christine. I should also note in reply to one of your other
> messages that we were originally on something close to 1.6 (before 1.6
> was actually released), so I can confirm that the Dymos worked there,
> too. I believe that the library settings for font family, size, etc were
> introduced in the 2.0 release, so hopefully you'll find them there.
>