[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] holds not picking up
Anne Murray
anne.hamilton4 at ntlworld.com
Wed Aug 8 07:43:23 EDT 2012
We're using 2.1.0 - I think it may well be the statuses - I will look in to
this. Thanks for the info on the check-in modifier too - all very useful!
Anne
On 8 August 2012 12:38, Ben Shum <bshum at biblio.org> wrote:
> Oops, hit send too fast. The reason I suggest using the check-in modifier
> for retargeting holds is that it bypasses the previous check time I mention
> and resets holds associated with the material so that the check occurs
> immediately, often resulting in a hold being triggered. This does have the
> added effect of slowing down the check-in event (since you take more time
> to process all the holds, etc.) but one would only be using the option
> during the cataloging of brand new items.
>
> -- Ben
>
>
> On 08/08/2012 07:36 AM, Ben Shum wrote:
>
>> Hi Anne,
>>
>> Which version of Evergreen are you using? In more recent versions (since
>> 2.1.0 and upwards, I think), it's possible to use a special "check-in
>> modifier" (lower right corner of the check-in screen) to enable the
>> re-targeting of holds upon check-in of items. This special modifier is
>> used when handling brand new material that gets added to an Evergreen
>> system.
>>
>> Presently, holds are only targeted once every 24 hours based on the time
>> that the hold was initially placed first. There's a field on the hold
>> table called "prev_check_time" (previous check time) that tells the
>> targeter to skip said hold until it passes that point. So depending on
>> when the patron or staff created the hold, and then based on the regularity
>> of your hold targeter script, the availability of materials that can
>> fulfill a hold will vary greatly. In our consortium, we run our hold
>> targeter every 15 minutes, but because of the 24 hour wait time built into
>> each hold, it still doesn't match brand new items to some existing holds
>> till the following day. For example, a hold could be created at 1 pm on
>> Monday, a new item created to fill that hold on 2 pm on Monday, but that
>> hold won't target that new item till 1 pm on Tuesday after the previous
>> check time elapses and the hold targeter actually does another check.
>>
>> Another possibility is that whichever copy status that is being used when
>> processing books ordered and scanned in your first mentioned approach is
>> one that does not allow holds to be placed/processed on the material. You
>> may want to double check that the copy status options are all in order on
>> your system as well and that holds are allowed on the statuses you expect.
>>
>> Hope this helps somewhat, please feel free to ask more questions. Holds
>> can be a little perplexing...
>>
>> -- Ben
>>
>> On 08/08/2012 07:05 AM, Anne Murray wrote:
>>
>>> Can anyone help with this as we can't find the problem. If we order more
>>> copies of a very popular book, when they are scanned through check in, the
>>> holds aren't triggered. The holds targetter is running ok. Also, if we buy
>>> a book from Amazon (say) and catalogue it ourselves, the hold goes on ok,
>>> but again when it reaches the library the hold isn't picked up and the
>>> status goes to 'reshelving'.
>>> Anne Murray
>>> Service Support Officer
>>> East Dunbartonshire Libraries
>>> Kirkintilloch
>>> Scotland
>>>
>>
>>
> --
> Benjamin Shum
> Open Source Software Coordinator
> Bibliomation, Inc.
> 32 Crest Road
> Middlebury, CT 06762
> 203-577-4070, ext. 113
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://libmail.georgialibraries.org/pipermail/open-ils-general/attachments/20120808/13a6bb82/attachment.htm>
More information about the Open-ils-general
mailing list