[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] State of the map of Evergreen libraries?

Mary Llewellyn mllewell at biblio.org
Wed May 9 15:32:39 EDT 2012


I agree. Much clearer picture of the spread of Evergreen when each library
is included. 

-----Original Message-----
From: open-ils-general-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org
[mailto:open-ils-general-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of
Kathy Lussier
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 3:15 PM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] State of the map of Evergreen libraries?

 > 2) Handling consortia vs. individual libraries. Do we want to try to  >
plot each library in a given consortia on the map, or just one entry for  >
a given consortia? I think I would prefer to see one entry per library,  >
as the full might of PINES' nearly 300 libraries would stand out, or  >
Conifer's>  1000km stretch from Windsor to Thunder Bay.
 >

I vote for one entry per library on the map. I think it would be a truer
reflection of who is using Evergreen.

Kathy


--
Kathy Lussier
Project Coordinator
Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative
(508) 756-0172
(508) 755-3721 (fax)
klussier at masslnc.org
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier




More information about the Open-ils-general mailing list