[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] State of the map of Evergreen libraries?
Mary Llewellyn
mllewell at biblio.org
Wed May 9 15:32:39 EDT 2012
I agree. Much clearer picture of the spread of Evergreen when each library
is included.
-----Original Message-----
From: open-ils-general-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org
[mailto:open-ils-general-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of
Kathy Lussier
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 3:15 PM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] State of the map of Evergreen libraries?
> 2) Handling consortia vs. individual libraries. Do we want to try to >
plot each library in a given consortia on the map, or just one entry for >
a given consortia? I think I would prefer to see one entry per library, >
as the full might of PINES' nearly 300 libraries would stand out, or >
Conifer's> 1000km stretch from Windsor to Thunder Bay.
>
I vote for one entry per library on the map. I think it would be a truer
reflection of who is using Evergreen.
Kathy
--
Kathy Lussier
Project Coordinator
Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative
(508) 756-0172
(508) 755-3721 (fax)
klussier at masslnc.org
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier
More information about the Open-ils-general
mailing list