[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] BRrrrrrrrrrr

[Rogan Hamby]

SCLENDS did the same thing.  We came up with the same convention
independently.  It also helps a lot when doing various manipulations of
report data.

-- 


Rogan Hamby
Manager, Rock Hill Library
803-981-5853

York County Library System
http://www.yclibrary.org | http://www.facebook.com/yorkcountylibrary


“You can never get a cup of tea large enough or a book long enough to suit
me.” 
― C.S. Lewis <http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/1069006.C_S_Lewis>





On 11/6/12 10:38 AM, "Jason Etheridge" <jason at esilibrary.com> wrote:

>Don, I see no problems with that.  One convention that PINES came up
>with (or inherited from their previous system) was to combine the
>system shortname with the branch shortname to expose a bit of the
>hierarchy at a glance when looking at a specific lib, and to reduce
>the chance of collision with shortnames.
>
>So for example, you may want to consider:
>
>ASLAN
>-> ATS
>->-> ATS-BLF
>->->-> ATS-BLF-SA
>->->-> ATS-BLF-BL
>->-> ATS-MDD
>-> AUL
>->-> AUL-DFK
>->->-> AUL-DFK-UA
>->-> AUL-AUF
>
>-- Jason