[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] BRrrrrrrrrrr

[Donald Butterworth]

Great! Thanks for the insight! -- Don

On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Rogan Hamby <rogan.hamby at yclibrary.net>wrote:

>
> SCLENDS did the same thing.  We came up with the same convention
> independently.  It also helps a lot when doing various manipulations of
> report data.
>
> --
>
>
> Rogan Hamby
> Manager, Rock Hill Library
> 803-981-5853
>
> York County Library System
> http://www.yclibrary.org | http://www.facebook.com/yorkcountylibrary
>
>
> "You can never get a cup of tea large enough or a book long enough to suit
> me."
> -- C.S. Lewis <http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/1069006.C_S_Lewis>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 11/6/12 10:38 AM, "Jason Etheridge" <jason at esilibrary.com> wrote:
>
> >Don, I see no problems with that.  One convention that PINES came up
> >with (or inherited from their previous system) was to combine the
> >system shortname with the branch shortname to expose a bit of the
> >hierarchy at a glance when looking at a specific lib, and to reduce
> >the chance of collision with shortnames.
> >
> >So for example, you may want to consider:
> >
> >ASLAN
> >-> ATS
> >->-> ATS-BLF
> >->->-> ATS-BLF-SA
> >->->-> ATS-BLF-BL
> >->-> ATS-MDD
> >-> AUL
> >->-> AUL-DFK
> >->->-> AUL-DFK-UA
> >->-> AUL-AUF
> >
> >-- Jason
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://libmail.georgialibraries.org/pipermail/open-ils-general/attachments/20121106/69c3fa78/attachment.htm>