[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Wish list items from the Cataloging Interest Group meeting Evergreen 2014.

[Sarah Childs]

I have just added a somewhat related wishlist bug for improving the 
Copy Notes function. Curious to know if others would find these 
improvements would alleviate the need to publicly display local notes in 
MARC.

https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1297909

---
Sarah Childs
Technical Services Department Head
Hussey-Mayfield Memorial Public Library
250 North Fifth Street
Zionsville, IN 46077
317-873-3149 x13330
sarahc at zionsville.lib.in.us

On 2014-03-26 09:11, Hardy, Elaine wrote:
> I have added several wish list items we discussed during the 
> cataloging
> interest group meeting held at this year's Evergreen International
> Conference. They are:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Link to Edit MARC in record summary
> 
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1297833
> 
> 
> 
> In the record summary, in addition to links for Add Volumes and View 
> MARC,
> add a link to Edit MARC. Access to the link would be controlled by
> permissions so that if user did not have permission to edit a MARC 
> record
> the link would be "grayed" out and not functional for them. This would
> allow catalogers to access Edit MARC functionality more quickly and
> improve workflow.
> 
> 
> 
> MARC tag/field edit permissions
> 
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1297836
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Within MARC Edit, the ability to set permissions by MARC tag/field so 
> that
> a library could assign editing tasks for a specific field to an 
> individual
> user. For example, allowing a user to edit only the 300 field in the 
> MARC
> record and not be able to edit any other field.
> 
> 
> 
> In addition to being controlled by permissions, the ability to allow
> specific tag/field edits should also be a library or server setting so
> that a library or consortium can allow or disallow the functionality 
> as a
> whole.
> 
> 
> 
> Ability to display notes in public facing OPAC by specific library
> 
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1297838
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> In library consortia, local notes (e.g. 590s) specific to an 
> individual
> library's copy/item is not generally allowed. We would like the 
> ability to
> make local notes in the MARC bibliographic record display in OPAC 
> searches
> scoped to the specific library. We envision this to be similar to the 
> |9
> in 856 fields whereby coding within the field creates local notes that
> would then display only to the system or branch indicated in the 
> field.
> This would also be valuable to other note fields as well. For example,
> where different libraries have different use and reproduction rights 
> that
> could be indicated in a 540 note scoped for an individual library. 
> These
> notes would be repeatable with in the MARC bibliographic record.
> 
> 
> 
> For those of you that requested or supported the wish list items, 
> please
> take a moment to add to the Launchpad report, whether to clarify your
> request or to add that it effects you. If you did not request the 
> report,
> please login and do the same, or let us know where there may be 
> problems
> with the request we did not foresee in our discussion.
> 
> 
> 
> Please also let me know if I missed a discussion item you would like 
> to
> add as a wish list or bug fix.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Elaine
> 
> J. Elaine Hardy
> PINES & Collaborative Projects Manager
> Georgia Public Library Service
> 1800 Century Place, Ste 150
> Atlanta, Ga. 30345-4304
> 
> 404.235-7128
> 404.235-7201, fax
> ehardy at georgialibraries.org
> www.georgialibraries.org
> www.georgialibraries.org/pines