[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Wish list items from the Cataloging Interest Group meeting Evergreen 2014.

[Mary Llewellyn]

I've added myself as being affected by each of these bugs, and subscribed to
each. Fanning the bug heat flames!

 

From: open-ils-general-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org
[mailto:open-ils-general-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of
Hardy, Elaine
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 9:12 AM
To: 'Evergreen Community Catalogers'; 'Evergreen Discussion Group'
Subject: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Wish list items from the Cataloging Interest
Group meeting Evergreen 2014.

 

I have added several wish list items we discussed during the cataloging
interest group meeting held at this year's Evergreen International
Conference. They are:

 

 

Link to Edit MARC in record summary

https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1297833

 

In the record summary, in addition to links for Add Volumes and View MARC,
add a link to Edit MARC. Access to the link would be controlled by
permissions so that if user did not have permission to edit a MARC record
the link would be "grayed" out and not functional for them. This would allow
catalogers to access Edit MARC functionality more quickly and improve
workflow.

 

MARC tag/field edit permissions

https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1297836

 

 

Within MARC Edit, the ability to set permissions by MARC tag/field so that a
library could assign editing tasks for a specific field to an individual
user. For example, allowing a user to edit only the 300 field in the MARC
record and not be able to edit any other field.

 

In addition to being controlled by permissions, the ability to allow
specific tag/field edits should also be a library or server setting so that
a library or consortium can allow or disallow the functionality as a whole.

 

Ability to display notes in public facing OPAC by specific library

https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1297838

 

 

In library consortia, local notes (e.g. 590s) specific to an individual
library's copy/item is not generally allowed. We would like the ability to
make local notes in the MARC bibliographic record display in OPAC searches
scoped to the specific library. We envision this to be similar to the |9 in
856 fields whereby coding within the field creates local notes that would
then display only to the system or branch indicated in the field. This would
also be valuable to other note fields as well. For example, where different
libraries have different use and reproduction rights that could be indicated
in a 540 note scoped for an individual library. These notes would be
repeatable with in the MARC bibliographic record.

 

For those of you that requested or supported the wish list items, please
take a moment to add to the Launchpad report, whether to clarify your
request or to add that it effects you. If you did not request the report,
please login and do the same, or let us know where there may be problems
with the request we did not foresee in our discussion.

 

Please also let me know if I missed a discussion item you would like to add
as a wish list or bug fix.

 

 

Elaine

J. Elaine Hardy
PINES & Collaborative Projects Manager
Georgia Public Library Service
1800 Century Place, Ste 150
Atlanta, Ga. 30345-4304

404.235-7128
404.235-7201, fax
ehardy at georgialibraries.org
www.georgialibraries.org
www.georgialibraries.org/pines

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://libmail.georgialibraries.org/pipermail/open-ils-general/attachments/20140326/b077fb20/attachment-0001.htm>