[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029
Dea Nowell
dea at ucsld.org
Thu Oct 1 13:57:22 EDT 2015
Mary, we also strip the 029s as we don't see any reason to keep them.
I'm just noting that stripping them on import may be why Elaine (&
possibly Don) are unable to add them to records.
- Dea Nowell
On 10/1/2015 10:37 AM, Mary Llewellyn wrote:
>
> We’re stripping the 029s. Am I missing a reason why we should be
> keeping them?
>
> Mary
>
> Mary Llewellyn
>
> Database Manager
>
> Bibliomation, Inc.
>
> 24 Wooster Ave.
>
> Waterbury, CT 06708
>
> mllewell at biblio.org
>
> *From:*Open-ils-general
> [mailto:open-ils-general-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org] *On Behalf
> Of *Dea Nowell
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 01, 2015 12:58 PM
> *To:* Evergreen Discussion Group
> *Subject:* Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029
>
> Elaine, is your system stripping the 029 on import of records into the
> system? If so this is why it will not save the 029 in a record. We
> just discovered this with our system (Sage Library System) recently
> with a different field. Once we removed the field from those that
> were being stripped on import we were able to have the field saved in
> the bib. Just a thought to explore & it may address Don's query as
> well, I'm not sure.
> - Dea Nowell
>
> _______________________________
>
> UCSLD logo & tagline
> ___________________________________
> Dea Nowell, Technical Services Manager
> Umatilla County Special Library District
> 17 SW Frazer, Suite 360
> P O Box 1689
> Pendleton OR 97801
> (541) 966-0917 --> (406) 952-4049
> email: dea at ucsld.org <mailto:dea at ucsld.org> || web: www.ucsld.org
> <http://www.ucsld.org>
>
> On 10/1/2015 9:41 AM, Hardy, Elaine wrote:
>
> I was able to add an 016 to a bib record in the PINES database. I
> was not able to add an 029
>
> An 029 is a field used by OCLC to “system control numbers for
> records from non-OCLC automated systems (e.g., Library and
> Archives Canada, the British Library, WorldCat Cataloging Partners
> vendors, etc.). OCLC uses these numbers to process and track
> records from other systems.” http://www.oclc.org/bib
> formats/en/0xx/029.html
> <http://www.oclc.org/bibformats/en/0xx/029.html>. Not sure why it
> doesn’t retain on save. An 019, which is another field specific to
> OCLC, does (see http://www.oclc.org/bibformats/en/0xx/019.html).
> 029 seems to be system supplied; but, the 019 is system supplied…
>
> /Elaine/
>
> J. Elaine Hardy PINES & Collaborative Projects Manager Georgia
> Public Library Service 1800 Century Place, Ste 150 Atlanta, Ga.
> 30345-4304
>
> 404.235.7128 404.235.7201, fax ehardy at georgialibraries.org
> <mailto:ehardy at georgialibraries.org> www.georgialibraries.org
> <http://www.georgialibraries.org> www.georgialibraries.org/pines
> <http://www.georgialibraries.org/pines>
>
> *From:*Open-ils-general
> [mailto:open-ils-general-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Donald Butterworth *Sent:* Thursday, October 01, 2015
> 11:48 AM *To:* Evergreen Discussion Group *Subject:*
> [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> As part of a project to add more fields to the general keyword
> index, we discovered that we can't add the 016 and the 029 control
> number fields to a MARC record.
>
> It looks like it saves, but it isn't there when you do a new
> search. It also never shows on the MARC View screen.
>
> What do we need to do to add these fields?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Don
>
> --
>
> Don Butterworth Faculty Associate / Librarian III B.L. Fisher
> Library Asbury Theological Seminary
> don.butterworth at asburyseminary.edu
> <mailto:don.butterworth at asburyseminary.edu> (859) 858-2227
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://libmail.georgialibraries.org/pipermail/open-ils-general/attachments/20151001/8993b265/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 23060 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://libmail.georgialibraries.org/pipermail/open-ils-general/attachments/20151001/8993b265/attachment-0001.png>
More information about the Open-ils-general
mailing list