[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029
Donald Butterworth
don.butterworth at asburyseminary.edu
Thu Oct 1 14:03:10 EDT 2015
Ah Ha! That would explain it. We strip those fields as well. As a U.S.A.
library they aren't all that necessary for us.
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Dea Nowell <dea at ucsld.org> wrote:
> Elaine, is your system stripping the 029 on import of records into the
> system? If so this is why it will not save the 029 in a record. We just
> discovered this with our system (Sage Library System) recently with a
> different field. Once we removed the field from those that were being
> stripped on import we were able to have the field saved in the bib. Just a
> thought to explore & it may address Don's query as well, I'm not sure.
> - Dea Nowell
> _______________________________
>
> [image: UCSLD logo & tagline]
> ___________________________________
> Dea Nowell, Technical Services Manager
> Umatilla County Special Library District
> 17 SW Frazer, Suite 360
> P O Box 1689
> Pendleton OR 97801(541) 966-0917 --> (406) 952-4049
> email: dea at ucsld.org || web: www.ucsld.org
>
> On 10/1/2015 9:41 AM, Hardy, Elaine wrote:
>
> I was able to add an 016 to a bib record in the PINES database. I was not
> able to add an 029
>
>
>
> An 029 is a field used by OCLC to “system control numbers for records
> from non-OCLC automated systems (e.g., Library and Archives Canada, the
> British Library, WorldCat Cataloging Partners vendors, etc.). OCLC uses
> these numbers to process and track records from other systems.” http://www.oclc.org/bib
> formats/en/0xx/029.html <http://www.oclc.org/bibformats/en/0xx/029.html>.
> Not sure why it doesn’t retain on save. An 019, which is another field
> specific to OCLC, does (see http://www.oclc.org/bibformats/en/0xx/019.html).
> 029 seems to be system supplied; but, the 019 is system supplied…
>
>
>
> *Elaine*
>
>
>
> J. Elaine Hardy PINES & Collaborative Projects Manager Georgia Public
> Library Service 1800 Century Place, Ste 150 Atlanta, Ga. 30345-4304
>
>
>
> 404.235.7128 404.235.7201, fax ehardy at georgialibraries.org
> www.georgialibraries.org www.georgialibraries.org/pines
>
>
>
> *From:* Open-ils-general [
> mailto:open-ils-general-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org
> <open-ils-general-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org>] *On Behalf Of *Donald
> Butterworth *Sent:* Thursday, October 01, 2015 11:48 AM *To:* Evergreen
> Discussion Group *Subject:* [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029
>
>
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> As part of a project to add more fields to the general keyword index, we
> discovered that we can't add the 016 and the 029 control number fields to a
> MARC record.
>
> It looks like it saves, but it isn't there when you do a new search. It
> also never shows on the MARC View screen.
>
> What do we need to do to add these fields?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Don
>
> --
>
> Don Butterworth Faculty Associate / Librarian III B.L. Fisher Library
> Asbury Theological Seminary don.butterworth at asburyseminary.edu (859)
> 858-2227
>
>
--
Don Butterworth
Faculty Associate / Librarian III
B.L. Fisher Library
Asbury Theological Seminary
don.butterworth at asburyseminary.edu
(859) 858-2227
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://libmail.georgialibraries.org/pipermail/open-ils-general/attachments/20151001/86428aa6/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: UCSLD_RGB.png
Type: image/png
Size: 32269 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://libmail.georgialibraries.org/pipermail/open-ils-general/attachments/20151001/86428aa6/attachment-0001.png>
More information about the Open-ils-general
mailing list