[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Browse Indexes - 710

Jim Taylor jtaylor at jtdata.com
Fri Oct 9 15:58:48 EDT 2015


Appreciate the reply….oddly our 700 (non-t) tags didn’t need any work.

 

I made the 710 (non-t) tags work by adding

 

                                <role>

                                                <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>

                                </role>

 

since it looks like it requires a role for the index but the 700’s seems to indicate the same thing but they work without a role.

 

Needless to say it is a bit confusing from where I stand.

 

So your 710’s with a  subfield “t” show in your Author browse index without any tweaking?

 

Jim

 

From: Open-ils-general [mailto:open-ils-general-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Blake Henderson
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2015 4:45 PM
To: open-ils-general at list.georgialibraries.org
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Browse Indexes - 710

 

Jim,

We had this same issue. Be design, the mods32 xlst from LOC contains this line:

<xsl:for-each select="marc:datafield[@tag='700']​[not(marc:subfield[@code='t'])]">

(we addressed the 700 instead of the 710 but the solution is probably the same)

We updated that line in the xlst to:

<xsl:for-each select="marc:datafield[@ta​g='700'][marc:subfield[not (@code='t')]]">

This makes it match the stock Evergreen indexes even with the presence of the subfield "t".

Furthermore, we wanted to include the 700t in our title index. So we created an index:

INSERT INTO config.metabib_field ( field_class, name, label, format, xpath, search_field, authority_xpath, browse_field, browse_sort_xpath ) VALUES ('title', 'alternative_700t','Title Alternative (700t)', 'marcxml', $$//marc:datafield[@tag='700']/marc:subfield[@code="t"]$$, TRUE, null, TRUE, null);

Hope this helps!



-Blake-
Conducting Magic
MOBIUS
573-234-4513
877-312-3517

On 10/8/2015 4:23 PM, Jim Taylor wrote:

I am wondering if there is anyone using the Browse Indexes and, if so, have you verified that the 710’s with a subfield “t” and without (they are handled differently) are working.  As far as I can tell they will not work as configured in Evergreen right out of the box.   I have gotten the 710, without a “t”, to work, with a little tweaking, but still no luck with the 710 with a “t”.      I am reasonably sure this isn’t limited to the 710’s but am working down the list trying to make sure all the indexes are working and are configured correctly and this is the current problem.

 

So, if, you know, your 710 browse indexes work and you are willing to share the mod32 xslt  from the config.xml_transform table I would greatly appreciate it.  Unless you know of some other reason the indexes aren’t working by default…I supposed Evergreen could be configured by default to not have the 710’s work but that doesn’t seem likely since they are part of the mod2 transformation and the index configuration seems appropriate???

 

In any event, any information that could point me in the right direction would be appreciated.  Thank you.

 

Jim

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://libmail.georgialibraries.org/pipermail/open-ils-general/attachments/20151009/015c9376/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Open-ils-general mailing list