[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Indication of what caused fine forgiveness/voiding with Void overdue fines when items are marked lost org unit setting on 2.9
Brent Mills
brent at hoodriverlibrary.org
Fri Jan 29 12:39:12 EST 2016
Hi Dan,
Just wanted to put it out here for the list, but we've put in the
changes and are seeing correct note entries being generated for overdue
reversals on items turning lost now.
Thanks!
-Brent
On 1/28/16 12:22 PM, Dan Wells wrote:
>
> Okay, it turns out I had actually posted the fix before the holidays,
> but it hasn’t been reviewed or committed yet. I have now force pushed
> a couple small tweaks, and you can see it all here:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1526547
>
> It’s a very small set of changes. One thing holding it back is a lack
> of automated testing, and I’m still not too sure how to meet that need.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Dan
>
> Daniel Wells
>
> Library Programmer/Analyst
>
> Hekman Library, Calvin College
>
> 616.526.7133
>
> *From:*Open-ils-general
> [mailto:open-ils-general-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org] *On Behalf
> Of *Dan Wells
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 28, 2016 1:59 PM
> *To:* Evergreen Discussion Group
> <open-ils-general at list.georgialibraries.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Indication of what caused fine
> forgiveness/voiding with Void overdue fines when items are marked lost
> org unit setting on 2.9
>
> Hello Brent,
>
> Ah, sorry about that. You are right. We have that note due to a
> local patch for a different (related) bug.
>
> I’ll get it sorted and post a link to the bug(s) with branch(es).
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Dan
>
> Daniel Wells
>
> Library Programmer/Analyst
>
> Hekman Library, Calvin College
>
> 616.526.7133
>
> *From:*Open-ils-general
> [mailto:open-ils-general-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org] *On Behalf
> Of *Brent Mills
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 27, 2016 7:34 PM
> *To:* open-ils-general at list.georgialibraries.org
> <mailto:open-ils-general at list.georgialibraries.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Indication of what caused fine
> forgiveness/voiding with Void overdue fines when items are marked lost
> org unit setting on 2.9
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> Thanks for the quick reply. I should have included the Note field from
> the column picker in the (present) screen shot. But there is nothing
> in that field for any of the account_adjust payments for "System:
> VOIDED OVERDUE FOR LOST". A check in the database for entries in
> money.account_adjustment only shows note entries for "System: OVERDUE
> REVERSED FOR CLAIMS-RETURNED" right now.
>
> -Brent
>
> On 1/27/16 3:06 PM, Dan Wells wrote:
>
> Hello Brent,
>
> Those adjustments should already have a note, but it looks like
> your note column is not displaying. Try adding it from the column
> picker in the upper right corner of that box. The note should say
> “System: VOIDED OVERDUE FOR LOST”. (Certainly not the best note as
> far as wording goes, but I think it was just taken wholesale from
> the old note applied to the billing.)
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Dan
>
> Daniel Wells
>
> Library Programmer/Analyst
>
> Hekman Library, Calvin College
>
> 616.526.7133
>
> *From:*Open-ils-general
> [mailto:open-ils-general-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Brent Mills
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 27, 2016 4:30 PM
> *To:* Evergreen Discussion Group
> <open-ils-general at list.georgialibraries.org>
> <mailto:open-ils-general at list.georgialibraries.org>
> *Subject:* [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Indication of what caused fine
> forgiveness/voiding with Void overdue fines when items are marked
> lost org unit setting on 2.9
>
> Hello,
>
> We recently upgraded to 2.9.1 from 2.7.5 and the negative balance
> fixes have changed what some libraries -- with the /Void overdue
> fines when items are marked lost /library setting enabled -- were
> used to seeing in the patron bills tab.
>
> Example:
> Patron with overdue book has it marked lost. Library Setting for
> "/Void overdue fines when items are marked lost/" is enabled for
> the the library where this occurred.
>
> Previously, the fines were voided as normal and the display gave a
> little more information about what caused the voiding in the Note
> field.
>
> Now, the overdue forgiveness has moved to the payment section
> which I understand is correct from the conditional negative
> balance documentation for 2.9 at
> http://docs.evergreen-ils.org/2.9/_circulation_2.html
>
> The account adjustment payment type will also be used for all
> libraries, regardless of the state of negative balance
> settings, in cases where overdue fines are adjusted when an
> overdue item is marked lost.
>
>
> I was wondering if there was a way to indicate what those payments
> are for to the staff members? The account_adjustment payment type
> helps, but it would be nice if there was a note field entry for
> "Overdue Forgiveness Payments" or something like that.
>
> Just curious how/if other libraries are handling this situation
> (or if it's even an issue for most).
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
>
> Brent Mills
>
> Systems Librarian | Sage Library System
>
> email:brent at hoodriverlibrary.org <mailto:brent at hoodriverlibrary.org>
>
> tickets: sagelib.org/support
>
> --
> Brent Mills
> Systems Librarian | Sage Library System
> email:brent at hoodriverlibrary.org <mailto:brent at hoodriverlibrary.org>
> tickets: sagelib.org/support
> desk/mobile: 541.387.5063 / 541.610.8384
--
Brent Mills
Systems Librarian | Sage Library System
email: brent at hoodriverlibrary.org
tickets: sagelib.org/support
desk/mobile: 541.387.5063 / 541.610.8384
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://libmail.georgialibraries.org/pipermail/open-ils-general/attachments/20160129/c7876000/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: account_adjustment_correct_notes.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 98506 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://libmail.georgialibraries.org/pipermail/open-ils-general/attachments/20160129/c7876000/attachment-0001.jpg>
More information about the Open-ils-general
mailing list