[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Competition for Evergreen?
Yamil Suarez
ysuarez at berklee.edu
Sat May 7 15:08:54 EDT 2016
Hello,
Here is another less diplomatic take on this new phase of the Kuali
Project.
http://thoughts.care-affiliates.com/2016/04/the-ole-merry-go-round-spins-on.html
I will continue to keep my eye on them since they are supposed to have a
hyper focus on academic libraries, which of course is an interest to me/my
library. I suspect there are certain things that the older Kuali code did
or the future code may do that could give this community ideas.
Later,
Yamil
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Galen Charlton <gmc at esilibrary.com>
Date: Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 1:16 PM
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Competition for Evergreen?
To: Evergreen Discussion Group <open-ils-general at list.georgialibraries.org>
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Jason Etheridge <jason at esilibrary.com>
wrote:
> Other than them being completely wrong about Evergreen's technical
> merits (for example, Equinox is doing multitenancy now via Sequoia),
> more power to them.
And for that matter, Koha's Debian packages have supported
multitenancy for years.
Regards,
Galen
--
Galen Charlton
Infrastructure and Added Services Manager
Equinox Software, Inc. / Open Your Library
email: gmc at esilibrary.com
direct: +1 770-709-5581
cell: +1 404-984-4366
skype: gmcharlt
web: http://www.esilibrary.com/
Supporting Koha and Evergreen: http://koha-community.org &
http://evergreen-ils.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://libmail.georgialibraries.org/pipermail/open-ils-general/attachments/20160507/0e42a535/attachment.html>
More information about the Open-ils-general
mailing list