[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] [External] Re: Publication Year in Reports

[Patrick, Irene]

The weird looking report results that I mentioned seem to be coming from the bib information.  Date1 in each of the records had full years; Date2 had 4 characters (numbers), which appear to represent the month and day information that was expressed in the 264.  I would have assumed if the date information in the report was using data from the fixed field that it would have looked the same as what was actually in the fixed field.


[cid:image001.png at 01D373EF.5EEAF1F0]Irene Patrick
Library & Information Management Systems Librarian
NC Dept. of Natural and Cultural Resources
919.807.7413  |  irene.patrick at ncdcr.gov


109 E. Jones St.  | 4640 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-4600
Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/ncghl>  Twitter<http://www.twitter.com/ncpedia>  YouTube<http://www.youtube.com/user/statelibrarync>  Website<https://statelibrary.ncdcr.gov/>

Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.



From: Rogan Hamby [mailto:rhamby at equinoxinitiative.org]
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 6:55 PM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group <open-ils-general at list.georgialibraries.org>
Subject: [External] Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Publication Year in Reports

CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to report.spam at nc.gov<mailto:report.spam at nc.gov>.

I can't speak for everyone but I believe that it does.  Maybe ... 90% sure.  On my phone right now but I'll try to check when I'm near a laptop later.




Rogan Hamby

Data and Project Analyst

Equinox Open Library Initiative

phone:  1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)

email:  rogan at EquinoxInitiative.org<mailto:rogan at EquinoxInitiative.org>
web:  http://EquinoxInitiative.org

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Jason Stephenson <jason at sigio.com<mailto:jason at sigio.com>> wrote:
Is everyone sure that the report is using the 264$c for the publication
year? The OPAC uses 008 Date1, and that leads to some weird pub date
sorting.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://libmail.georgialibraries.org/pipermail/open-ils-general/attachments/20171213/de357354/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 8625 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://libmail.georgialibraries.org/pipermail/open-ils-general/attachments/20171213/de357354/attachment-0001.png>