[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Translations in Angular 6+ (Was Evergreen 3.3 Release Update)

Wed Mar 20 12:10:16 EDT 2019

Hello Eva,

Thank you for raising this concern.  I think we are in the process of
figuring things out as we go along.

Our current best plan (I think) is to use the account we set up with
POEditor.com.  It looks like you already have an account there, so at least
you are familiar with what I am talking about.  What hasn't been figured
out yet is what that overall update process looks like, and what the new
build steps will be.  For the first part at least, your input will be very
valuable.

We did a test import back in November or so (I think it was at the
Hack-a-way).  I would like to try to do another import to add any
new/changed strings and see what happens, but being a completely new and
unfamiliar tool, I am a little afraid of losing any work already put in
there.

So, a few questions:

1) Based on what you have already done in POEditor, do you think it is a
viable solution?

2) I will do my best to preserve what is there, and I hope the re-import
does the right thing, but how much would it take to redo the work done
there so far if things go very badly?

3) Do you have a planned timeline for upgrading to 3.3?

Sincerely,
Dan

On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 11:52 AM Cerninakova Eva <cernin at jabok.cz> wrote:

> Hi Daniel,
>
> Considering the last year discussion about integrating Angular 6 template
> translations into the Evergreen translation tools, I would like to ask a
> question about translation workflow of Evergreen 3.3 release. Will it
> change some way in comparison with previous releases, due the impossibility
> to use Launchpad for translations of Angular strings? And if so, how the
> Angular strings are supposed to be translated during the 3.3 release
> process? (I am asking from translators point of view.)
>
> Thanks for the answer ;-)
> Eva
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
> Mgr. Eva Cerniňáková
> cernin at jabok.cz
> Tel. +420 211 222 409
>
> Knihovna Jabok
> http:/knihovna.jabok.cz
> Tel.  +420 211 222 410
> Jabok - Vyšší odborná škola sociálně pedagogická a teologická
> Salmovská 8, 120 00 Praha 2
>
>
>
> st 20. 2. 2019 v 16:03 odesílatel Daniel Wells <dbwells at gmail.com> napsal:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Two weeks have slid by once more, and today we mark, ostensibly, the
>> feature freeze for Evergreen 3.3.  Any new features not committed by the
>> end of the day will need to wait for the 3.4 release in the fall.  Once
>> again, here are the feature branches under consideration:
>>
>>
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bugs?&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&field.status%3Alist=TRIAGED&field.status%3Alist=INPROGRESS&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.importance%3Alist=WISHLIST&assignee_option=none&field.milestone%3Alist=86802&search=Search&orderby=title&start=0
>>
>>
>> As careful observers will note, we still have one week after today before
>> the 3.3 beta.  However, this exists not as a time to continue adding
>> features, but as a time to make corrections for obvious issues which crop
>> up due to feature freeze activity.  The cutoff for new features has
>> historically encouraged a mad dash of activity, and this scheduling gap
>> exists not as an excuse to postpone such dashings, but to remedy the
>> problems it brings.  So I gladly encourage those so inclined to dash as
>> madly as ever, but understand that it ends tonight!
>>
>> Now, that said, if a branch is in an obvious state of active review and
>> revision, yet doesn't make the cutoff, please let me know and we can
>> probably work it in.  I intend to start doing internal building and testing
>> starting tomorrow morning, and will not be terribly keen on straggling code
>> walking in unannounced.  Thank you for your diligence and understanding.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Dan
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 12:40 PM Daniel Wells <dbwells at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Dearest fellow Evergreeners,
>>>
>>> After several months of quiet contemplation and tireless toiling by many
>>> members of the Evergreen community, it is past time for a brief message
>>> from me, your minimalist 3.3 release manager.
>>>
>>> First, as we enter this final trimester of the release process, it seems
>>> worth revisiting the originally proposed timeline:
>>>
>>> 2/20/19 - Feature freeze
>>> 2/27/19 - Beta release
>>> 3/20/19 - Release Candidate
>>> 3/27/19 - Final release
>>>
>>> Accordingly, we are now exactly two weeks away from our intended feature
>>> freeze date.  Please recall, however, that there is now a one week buffer
>>> between feature cutoff and the actual beta release, so if we reach the
>>> evening of 2/19, and a few extra days would make or break your feature,
>>> please do not hesitate to speak up.
>>>
>>> I've spent a few hours over the last several days looking over
>>> everything targeted at 3.3 in LaunchPad and trying to get a sense of where
>>> we stand.  As of this moment, there are exactly 99 uncommitted tickets for
>>> 3.3.  I initially thought, "surely some of these do not have pullrequests,"
>>> and while that proved to be true for 8 or 9 entries, inspection showed them
>>> all to be close enough to deserve their targets.  So, let's just say the
>>> 3.3 release has great potential!
>>>
>>> Looking forward, and given the nearness of feature freeze, I want to
>>> encourage everyone to focus their energy for the next two weeks on our
>>> "Wishlist" tickets, as these are in the most present danger of being left
>>> behind.  As of this writing, there are 25 unclaimed Wishlist tickets hoping
>>> for inclusion in 3.3:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bugs?&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&field.status%3Alist=TRIAGED&field.status%3Alist=INPROGRESS&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.importance%3Alist=WISHLIST&assignee_option=none&field.milestone%3Alist=86802&search=Search&orderby=title&start=0
>>>
>>> While the other 74 bugs for 3.3 are certainly welcome at any time, we
>>> will have exactly one month between feature freeze and RC to devote to the
>>> likes of these.  It is worth noting, however, that a good number of those
>>> 74 are officially "Undecided" in importance.  I did a pass through them all
>>> to pull out any which seemed like feature requests, but if you feel I
>>> missed something, please target accordingly.
>>>
>>> Finally, in looking over things already committed for 3.3, I am struck
>>> by a fair number of branches which are not flashy new features, but which
>>> nonetheless are necessary endeavors to keep Evergreen humming along.  I'd
>>> like to end this email with a special salute to those among us giving their
>>> time and attention to things like Ubuntu and PostgreSQL version changes,
>>> making sure it is something most of us never need to think much about.
>>> Thank you!  If you are not one who generally watches LaunchPad closely, it
>>> may be worth a few moments to peruse some of the committed 3.3 tickets to
>>> see these folks at work:
>>> https://launchpad.net/evergreen/+milestone/3.3-beta1
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>> Dan
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://libmail.georgialibraries.org/pipermail/open-ils-general/attachments/20190320/4ba17029/attachment.html>