[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Marc field change script
Rogan Hamby
rhamby at equinoxinitiative.org
Tue Apr 7 09:03:34 EDT 2020
To me, and this is personal preference I think, I don't see a big
difference between writing something once outside the db versus in it.
Both approaches are fine in my mind. It does make me think of a point I
didn't mention though, which is I wouldn't store a function in any existing
Evergreen schema. If you do make your own functions for tasks like this
create a distinct schema for them along with any tables. I'm not a fan of
mixing project stuff into the stock schemas.
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 8:45 AM Jason Stephenson <jason at sigio.com> wrote:
> Glen & Rogan,
>
> I prefer to do these things outside of the database, i.e. pull the
> record out with DBI, modify it, and then update it with DBI.
>
> I'm not a fan of writing database functions for something that I'll use
> only once or twice.
>
> I have some utility scripts that I've used and shared with the world
> available on Github:
>
> https://github.com/Dyrcona/evergreen_utilities/tree/master/perl
>
> A couple of those might prove useful as examples, possibly loaderecords.pl
> .
>
> My pre-conference presentation last year covered getting started writing
> utility programs in Perl using the Evergreen back end. The files for it
> are also available on Github:
>
> https://github.com/Dyrcona/evergreen2019-preconference
>
> I hope that you find the above to be useful, and if you have more
> technical questions, the conversation should probably move to the
> development list.
>
> Cheers,
> Jason
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://libmail.georgialibraries.org/pipermail/open-ils-general/attachments/20200407/1f95523c/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Open-ils-general
mailing list