[Evergreen-catalogers] 700s under 600s
Kathy Lussier
klussier at masslnc.org
Thu May 12 10:06:31 EDT 2016
Also, I wanted to add a note that if you want to remove the 541 from the
display, you would remove the following from parts/record/contents.tt2
{
label => l('Immediate Source of Acquisition Note: '),
xpath => '//*[@tag="541"]'
},
I don't know what the best way would be to make it only display in
staff-only mode. Perhaps you could:
remove the tag from contents.tt2 as described above
Add it to misc_util.tt2 as described in the documentation I linked to in
the last e-mail.
When adding the new argument to summary.tt2, wrap it in a [%- IF
ctx.is_staff %] block.
Kathy
On 05/12/2016 09:48 AM, Kathy Lussier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>> We are part of a consortium and our institutions have electronic
>> titles that are only available to them. When the $w and $9 subfields
>> are added to the "Electronic Location and Access" field (856) to
>> suppress visibility, it actually hides it from the catalogers in
>> Staff PAC because we log on at the consortium level and not the
>> institutional level. Not good.
>
> There are ways you can address this issue. If I remember correctly, if
> staff set their preferred library to the institution, it should
> retrieve electronic resources belonging that that library. However, I
> haven't tested that particular feature in a while, and I'm unsure
> which workstation search preferences would affect whether its
> retrieved or not.
>
> Alternatively, you could use the "When enabled, Located URIs will
> provide visibility behavior identical to copies" global flag to make
> those materials appear when searching at the consortium scope. There
> is documentation on how this flag affects search results at
> http://docs.evergreen-ils.org/2.10/_cataloging_electronic_resources_8201_8212_8201_finding_them_in_catalog_searches.html
>
> Beyond the electronic resources, there may be some areas where the
> community comes to consensus on which MARC tags display and where they
> display. It sounds like the display of 700s below the title may be one
> of those areas of consensus, but I, personally, would like this idea
> to be shared on Launchpad and with the general list before such a
> change is pushed into master. I think there are a lot of people who
> may have an opinion on the change but do not subscribe to this list.
> My recollection is that the current display was based on how Amazon
> displays author/performer information. I'm not advocating for one
> approach over another, but just pointing to the fact that there was a
> model being followed with the default display being used today.
>
> No matter what the community consensus is, though, there will always
> be one tweak or another that an individual Evergreen site will want to
> make to the MARC fields that are displaying. That's why I think it's
> important for each site to have somebody available who is able to make
> these types of changes to the record. Removing or adding a field is a
> common customization made to Evergreen catalogs. Moving the field may
> be a little more difficult since there may be some layout issues to
> resolve, but our local sites have had success re-positioning fields
> through trial and error.
>
> I know the link for customizing the catalog has already been sent out
> on this thread, but I'm sending the link that specifically talks about
> how to add the fields:
>
> http://docs.evergreen-ils.org/2.10/_designing_your_catalog.html#_adding_and_removing_marc_fields_from_the_record_details_display_page
>
> I'm sure many of us will be happy to assist if anyone has trouble
> making these customizations.
>
> Kathy
>
>
>
>
> On 05/12/2016 08:26 AM, Donald Butterworth wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> I too have a small laundry list of "out of the box" PAC display issues
>>
>> * Alternate Title fields (740, 240, 246) are indexed, but don't
>> appear on our PAC display.
>> * The "Immediate Source of Acquisitions" note field (541) does
>> display, but it should be a staff only field. Really, it should
>> not even appear on the public MARC display.
>> * We are part of a consortium and our institutions have electronic
>> titles that are only available to them. When the $w and $9
>> subfields are added to the "Electronic Location and Access" field
>> (856) to suppress visibility, it actually hides it from the
>> catalogers in Staff PAC because we log on at the consortium level
>> and not the institutional level. Not good.
>> * One thing that drives me crazy as a cataloger is being forced to
>> scroll down to see what the subjects are on a bib record, which
>> is nearly always the last entry at the very bottom of the screen.
>> It's not good for researchers either, because those subjects are
>> key access points that are used to point to additional research
>> areas. In my opinion, there is way too much white space between
>> the Title area and the copy/item area. Personally I want to see
>> "record details" in this area.
>>
>> I'm sure I could come up with a bunch more if I only had some spare
>> time ;-)
>>
>> Don
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Elaine Hardy
>> <ehardy at georgialibraries.org <mailto:ehardy at georgialibraries.org>> wrote:
>>
>> I agree that changing the location of the 7xx fields in the
>> default OPAC display is something we should discuss. There are
>> other changes I would like to see to the default display such as
>> removing the (added author) labels. This is especially odd
>> looking for headings with a relator term or code.
>>
>> I like having that long list of contributors in the drop down
>> menu as Yamil has done. It might need to be a little more
>> visible..... I also like calling them contributors rather than
>> added authors -- covers a whole range of tasks.
>>
>> Elaine
>>
>>
>>
>> J. Elaine Hardy
>> PINES & Collaborative Projects Manager
>> Georgia Public Library Service/PINES
>> 1800 Century Place, Ste. 150
>> Atlanta, GA 30045
>>
>> 404.235.7128 <tel:404.235.7128> Office
>> 404.548.4241 <tel:404.548.4241> Cell
>> 404.235.7201 <tel:404.235.7201> FAX
>>
>> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Kathy Lussier
>> <klussier at masslnc.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Susan,
>>
>> From my understanding of Yamil's response, the 700s don't
>> display under the subjects because Berklee hasn't made that
>> customization to its catalog. The customization Berklee made
>> was to remove the 700s entirely from that string that
>> displays under the title and to locate it in one of the
>> collapsible sections near the bottom.
>>
>> Looking quickly at Yamil's latest e-mail, it looks like a
>> reasonable approach to do what you are asking to do. However,
>> it isn't something I've tested. As with most catalog
>> customizations, it's one of those things that will probably
>> require some trial and error to get to display exactly as you
>> like.
>>
>> Feel free to let us know if you come across any trouble while
>> trying it out!
>>
>> Kathy
>>
>> On 05/11/2016 03:52 PM, Oxford, Susan wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks, Yamil. I’m looking at a record from your library for
>>> Macbeth:
>>>
>>> Giuseppe Verdi's Macbeth [videorecording]
>>>
>>> https://catalog.berklee.edu/eg/opac/record/41447?qtype=author;query=Franz%20%20David;facet=subject%7Cname%5BMacbeth%20King%20of%20Scotland%2011th%20cent%5D
>>>
>>> I don’t see the 700s under the title, which is nice. I can
>>> see the 700s in the MARC record. I don’t see the 700s under
>>> the 600s in the OPAC record although I would like to.
>>>
>>> I’m wondering why your 700s aren’t visible in the OPAC
>>> record under the 600s?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Susan
>>>
>>> /Susan Oxford, MLIS/
>>>
>>> /Campus Librarian, Thompson/
>>>
>>> /University College of the North/
>>>
>>> /204-677-6408 <tel:204-677-6408>/
>>>
>>> *From:*Evergreen-catalogers
>>> [mailto:evergreen-catalogers-bounces at list.evergreen-ils.org]
>>> *On Behalf Of *Yamil Suarez
>>> *Sent:* May-11-16 2:34 PM
>>> *To:* Evergreen Community Catalogers
>>> *Subject:* Re: [Evergreen-catalogers] 700s under 600s
>>>
>>> First of all for Susan and others here, this situation
>>> reminds me that I have wanted to have the community consider
>>> changing the default behavior of EG so that 7xx author data
>>> is not displayed by default right below the title in the
>>> OPAC record view. My reason is that our library has many
>>> records that would end up with very long lists of 7xx fields
>>> showing up right below the title. Therefore a OPAC
>>> customization I always use is to display the 7xx author data
>>> lower down the record page in the OPAC. Just wondering what
>>> other's think.
>>>
>>> Susan, I believe that Kathy's approach will remove the
>>> listing of authors (both 1xx and 7xx authors) from below the
>>> title and list them next to the subjects. This might work
>>> fine for you, though it would mean that no authors are
>>> listed right below the title.
>>>
>>> A variation on Kathy's approach would be two create a copy
>>> of the "author.tt2" file with a different name, like
>>> "authors_1xx.tt2" with the changes I recommended earlier
>>> (that remove the 7xx data). Then rename the entry that says
>>> [%- INCLUDE "opac/parts/record/authors.tt2" %] near the top
>>> of the summary file to point to [%- INCLUDE
>>> "opac/parts/record/authors_1xx.tt2" %] so that your 1xx data
>>> still shows up right below the title.
>>>
>>> Then just like Kathy said add [%- INCLUDE
>>> "opac/parts/record/authors.tt2" %] further below the
>>> summary.tt2 file below the [%- INCLUDE
>>> "opac/parts/record/subjects.tt2" %]
>>>
>>> That way 1xx author data shows up right below the title, but
>>> the 1xx & 7xx author data will show up near the subjects.
>>> Though you might need to customize authors.tt2 a bit to add
>>> a visible label that says something like "Authors: " before
>>> the list of authors is displayed.
>>>
>>> For example in authors.tt2 look for the line...
>>>
>>> <div class='rdetail_authors_div'>
>>>
>>> and add a label to it like this...
>>>
>>> <div class='rdetail_authors_div'>Authors:
>>>
>>> On my catalog I did something similar to the above, but I
>>> believe I copied and renamed "awards.tt2" file to
>>> "contributors.tt2" solely display my 7xx authors data in one
>>> of the "collapsible" sections near the bottom. To do that I
>>> had to add one line to "extras.tt2" which controls the order
>>> of the "collapsible" sections at the bottom, among other things.
>>>
>>> Susan, I hope this helps a bit. Since we are getting pretty
>>> technical in terms of customizing the OPAC we might want to
>>> move the discussion to the general or the technical list. We
>>> can also continue on the IRC channel.
>>>
>>> Also, Kathy or others please correct me if I have made any
>>> mistakes.
>>>
>>> Good luck,
>>>
>>> Yamil
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------
>>>
>>> Yamil Suarez, MCS
>>> Library Systems Administrator/Developer
>>>
>>> Stan Getz Library
>>> Berklee College of Music
>>> 1140 Boylston St
>>> Boston, MA 02215
>>>
>>> ysuarez at berklee.edu <mailto:ysuarez at berklee.edu>
>>> 617-747-2617 <tel:617-747-2617>
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Oxford, Susan
>>> <soxford at ucn.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Would these solutions list the 700s under the 600s in
>>> the OPAC?
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> Susan
>>>
>>> /Susan Oxford, MLIS/
>>>
>>> /Campus Librarian, Thompson/
>>>
>>> /University College of the North/
>>>
>>> /204-677-6408 <tel:204-677-6408>/
>>>
>>> *From:*Evergreen-catalogers
>>> [mailto:evergreen-catalogers-bounces at list.evergreen-ils.org]
>>> *On Behalf Of *Yamil Suarez
>>> *Sent:* May-11-16 11:11 AM
>>> *To:* Evergreen Community Catalogers
>>> *Subject:* Re: [Evergreen-catalogers] 700s under 600s
>>>
>>> Susan,
>>>
>>> To remove the 7xx from the title I customize the
>>> templates/opac/parts/record/authors.tt2 file[1]
>>>
>>> There is a section that looks like this that I then
>>> shorten....
>>>
>>> authors = [
>>>
>>> {
>>>
>>> type => 'author',
>>>
>>> label => l('Author'),
>>>
>>> xpath =>
>>> '//*[@tag="100"]|//*[@tag="110"]|//*[@tag="111"]'
>>>
>>> }, {
>>>
>>> type => 'added',
>>>
>>> label => l('Added Author'),
>>>
>>> xpath =>
>>> '//*[@tag="700"]|//*[@tag="710"]|//*[@tag="711"]'
>>>
>>> }, {
>>>
>>> type => 'cast',
>>>
>>> label => l('Cast'),
>>>
>>> xpath => '//*[@tag="508"]'
>>>
>>> }, {
>>>
>>> type => 'notes',
>>>
>>> label => l('Author Notes: '),
>>>
>>> xpath => '' # Comes from added content...
>>>
>>> }
>>>
>>> ];
>>>
>>> Which I then shorten to this....
>>>
>>> authors = [
>>>
>>> {
>>>
>>> type => 'author',
>>>
>>> label => l('Author'),
>>>
>>> xpath =>
>>> '//*[@tag="100"]|//*[@tag="110"]|//*[@tag="111"]'
>>>
>>> }, {
>>>
>>> type => 'notes',
>>>
>>> label => l('Author Notes: '),
>>>
>>> xpath => '' # Comes from added content...
>>>
>>> }
>>>
>>> ];
>>>
>>> You can see in the code where it tries to grab 700 and
>>> 710 tags.
>>>
>>> [1] For the record, the recommended practice is not to
>>> edit the authors.tt2 file in place. You should create a
>>> new folder with the templates you want to override in a
>>> new folder, but with the same path. My path ends up
>>> being something like
>>> templates_berklee/opac/parts/record/authors.tt2
>>>
>>> Kathy's link explains this approach of creating a new
>>> folder for the templates you want to override, but you
>>> can follow up with me, the general or technology list .
>>>
>>> http://docs.evergreen-ils.org/2.10/_designing_your_catalog.html#_configuring_and_customizing_the_public_interface
>>>
>>>
>>> Good luck,
>>>
>>> Yamil
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------
>>>
>>> Yamil Suarez, MCS
>>> Library Systems Administrator/Developer
>>>
>>> Stan Getz Library
>>> Berklee College of Music
>>> 1140 Boylston St
>>> Boston, MA 02215
>>>
>>> ysuarez at berklee.edu
>>> 617-747-2617 <tel:617-747-2617>
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Kathy Lussier
>>> <klussier at masslnc.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Susan!
>>>
>>> I don't know if you have access to edit your
>>> Template Toolkit files, but you could make this
>>> change by editing the file in
>>> parts/record/summary.tt2. There is a bit at towards
>>> the top of the file that looks like:
>>>
>>> [%- INCLUDE "opac/parts/record/authors.tt2" %]
>>>
>>> which is what places those entries under the title.
>>>
>>> The bit towards the bottom that says:
>>>
>>> [%- INCLUDE "opac/parts/record/subjects.tt2" %]
>>>
>>> is what controls where the 600 fields display.
>>>
>>> You
>>>
>>> There is more information on making catalog
>>> customizations available at
>>> <http://docs.evergreen-ils.org/2.10/_designing_your_catalog.html#_configuring_and_customizing_the_public_interface>http://docs.evergreen-ils.org/2.10/_designing_your_catalog.html#_configuring_and_customizing_the_public_interface
>>>
>>> I hope this helps!
>>> Kathy
>>>
>>> On 05/11/2016 11:33 AM, Oxford, Susan wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I don’t know if this has ever been addressed or
>>> not but:
>>>
>>> How do we get the 700 fields to show in the OPAC
>>> listed under the 600 fields instead of under the
>>> title at the top?
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> Susan Oxford
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>
>>> Evergreen-catalogers mailing list
>>>
>>> Evergreen-catalogers at list.evergreen-ils.org
>>> <mailto:Evergreen-catalogers at list.evergreen-ils.org>
>>>
>>> http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/evergreen-catalogers
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Kathy Lussier
>>>
>>> Project Coordinator
>>>
>>> Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative
>>>
>>> (508) 343-0128 <tel:%28508%29%20343-0128>
>>>
>>> klussier at masslnc.org <mailto:klussier at masslnc.org>
>>>
>>> Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Evergreen-catalogers mailing list
>>> Evergreen-catalogers at list.evergreen-ils.org
>>> http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/evergreen-catalogers
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Evergreen-catalogers mailing list
>>> Evergreen-catalogers at list.evergreen-ils.org
>>> <mailto:Evergreen-catalogers at list.evergreen-ils.org>
>>> http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/evergreen-catalogers
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Evergreen-catalogers mailing list
>>> Evergreen-catalogers at list.evergreen-ils.org
>>> <mailto:Evergreen-catalogers at list.evergreen-ils.org>
>>> http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/evergreen-catalogers
>>
>> --
>> Kathy Lussier
>> Project Coordinator
>> Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative
>> (508) 343-0128 <tel:%28508%29%20343-0128>
>> klussier at masslnc.org <mailto:klussier at masslnc.org>
>> Twitter:http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Evergreen-catalogers mailing list
>> Evergreen-catalogers at list.evergreen-ils.org
>> <mailto:Evergreen-catalogers at list.evergreen-ils.org>
>> http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/evergreen-catalogers
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Evergreen-catalogers mailing list
>> Evergreen-catalogers at list.evergreen-ils.org
>> <mailto:Evergreen-catalogers at list.evergreen-ils.org>
>> http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/evergreen-catalogers
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Don Butterworth
>> Collection Management Librarian /
>> Faculty Associate
>> B.L. Fisher Library
>> Asbury Theological Seminary
>> don.butterworth at asburyseminary.edu
>> <mailto:don.butterworth at asburyseminary.edu>
>> (859) 858-2227
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Evergreen-catalogers mailing list
>> Evergreen-catalogers at list.evergreen-ils.org
>> http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/evergreen-catalogers
>
> --
> Kathy Lussier
> Project Coordinator
> Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative
> (508) 343-0128
> klussier at masslnc.org
> Twitter:http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Evergreen-catalogers mailing list
> Evergreen-catalogers at list.evergreen-ils.org
> http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/evergreen-catalogers
--
Kathy Lussier
Project Coordinator
Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative
(508) 343-0128
klussier at masslnc.org
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.evergreen-ils.org/pipermail/evergreen-catalogers/attachments/20160512/f614ed91/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Evergreen-catalogers
mailing list