[Evergreen-catalogers] RDA search formats

Fri Nov 10 12:33:58 EST 2017

+1 on the 33X fields not being useful without the support of the fixed
fields.

As to the MP3 CD audiobooks, interesting question!  We haven't purchased
these at my library, so I hadn't given it any thought, but there are other
libraries in our consortium buying them. After taking a look, they don't
seem to be consistently cataloged with fixed fields that would allow them
to sort separately from typical CD audiobooks.

Properly, like a Playaway, it seems they should have an 006 and an
additional 007 to account for their electronic resource aspects. Of course,
the trouble with the 006 is that it would be identical to the Playaway.
The 007 would be (at minimum): co nga  I did find at least one record which
was so coded (ocn974674749)

It would be a hassle, since this isn't standardized you'd have to continue
to add it to MP3 records.  And I'm pretty sure it would require more
sophistication in the code in order for it to accurately distinguish
between CD audiobooks, Playaways, and MP3 audiobooks (and probably other
computer files on disc). But that might be an avenue.

On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Janet Schrader <jschrader at cwmars.org> wrote:

> +1.
>
> These fields can only be used in conjunction with codes in the 008 and
> 007/006 fields.
>
> While on this topic, I'd like to know if anyone has created a format
> filter for MP3 CD audiobooks. The 007 field code for SMD is the same as
> regular CDs. Is there some other code(s) I could use?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Janet
>
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 1:30 PM, Elaine Hardy <ehardy at georgialibraries.org>
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>>
>>
>> J. Elaine Hardy
>> PINES & Collaborative Projects Manager
>> Georgia Public Library Service/PINES
>> 1800 Century Place, Ste. 150
>> Atlanta, GA 30045
>>
>> 404.235.7128 <(404)%20235-7128> Office
>> 404.548.4241 <(404)%20548-4241> Cell
>> 404.235.7201 <(404)%20235-7201> FAX
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Jane Sandberg <sandbej at linnbenton.edu>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I'd actually hesitate at this proposal, since the 33x terms don't
>>> really make a lot of distinctions that patrons would find helpful, for
>>> example:
>>>
>>> * Large type vs. standard type have the same 33x
>>> * DVD vs. Blu-ray have the same 33x
>>> * These fields are all repeatable.  Sometimes those combinations can
>>> mean that there are multiple parts, sometimes it means that several
>>> formats are incorporated into a single object.  For example, 336$atext
>>> and 336$images could mean a picture book, a graphic novel, a book of
>>> photographs with captions, an archival collection that includes both
>>> pamphlets and paintings, etc.
>>>
>>> I think that having 33x terms in the mix of
>>> what-fields-cause-which-icons is great.  I don't think that they
>>> should ever be used without other MARC fields to determine what icons
>>> display.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Elaine Hardy
>>> <ehardy at georgialibraries.org> wrote:
>>> > LC has handy tables that link the RDA terms in the MARC 33x fields to
>>> the
>>> > 007 field codes : 007/01 (for 338), Leader/06 codes (for 336) and
>>> 007/00
>>> > (for 337). See http://www.loc.gov/standards/valuelist/index.html. So,
>>> for
>>> > those search filters (and icons) that utilize those 007 codes, if a bib
>>> > record has the 33x fields, those terms and codes could be used instead.
>>> >
>>> > To further specify icons, the 007 field will still need to be used to
>>> > distinguish formats for videorecordings (007/04)
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > J. Elaine Hardy
>>> > PINES & Collaborative Projects Manager
>>> > Georgia Public Library Service/PINES
>>> > 1800 Century Place, Ste. 150
>>> > Atlanta, GA 30045
>>> >
>>> > 404.235.7128 <(404)%20235-7128> Office
>>> > 404.548.4241 <(404)%20548-4241> Cell
>>> > 404.235.7201 <(404)%20235-7201> FAX
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Rogan Hamby <
>>> rhamby at equinoxinitiative.org>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Good morning.
>>> >>
>>> >> I've started looking at how we can resolve RDA 336/337/338 tags for
>>> search
>>> >> formats.  There has already been community discussion here:
>>> >>
>>> >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1125621
>>> >>
>>> >> The good news is that we (the Evergreen 'we') already have that data
>>> >> pulled into the database so the next step is to use it.
>>> >>
>>> >> Before the code is written though I think there are some points for
>>> the
>>> >> larger community.  The big picture questions are - What combinations
>>> should
>>> >> map to existing search formats and which might need new ones?  Also, a
>>> >> logistic question - When new ones are needed where will the icons
>>> come from?
>>> >> (I can probably make them if need be.)
>>> >>
>>> >> Additionally, a working practice question.  My instinct (and I think
>>> that
>>> >> of many) is to say the code should basically check to see if there
>>> are RDA
>>> >> values and if so use those and fall back to AACR2.  Are there
>>> scenarios in
>>> >> practice when both should be used?  Following that up, if they do
>>> exist are
>>> >> these common enough / follow standards to any degree that we should
>>> worry
>>> >> about them or are they edge cases?
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Rogan Hamby
>>> >>
>>> >> Data and Project Analyst
>>> >>
>>> >> Equinox Open Library Initiative
>>> >>
>>> >> phone:  1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
>>> >>
>>> >> email:  rogan at EquinoxInitiative.org
>>> >>
>>> >> web:  http://EquinoxInitiative.org
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> Evergreen-catalogers mailing list
>>> >> Evergreen-catalogers at list.evergreen-ils.org
>>> >>
>>> >> http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/everg
>>> reen-catalogers
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Evergreen-catalogers mailing list
>>> > Evergreen-catalogers at list.evergreen-ils.org
>>> > http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/everg
>>> reen-catalogers
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jane Sandberg
>>> Electronic Resources Librarian
>>> Linn-Benton Community College
>>> sandbej at linnbenton.edu / 541-917-4655
>>> Pronouns: she/her/hers or they/them/theirs
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Evergreen-catalogers mailing list
>>> Evergreen-catalogers at list.evergreen-ils.org
>>> http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/everg
>>> reen-catalogers
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Evergreen-catalogers mailing list
>> Evergreen-catalogers at list.evergreen-ils.org
>> http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/everg
>> reen-catalogers
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Janet Schrader
> BIbliographic Services Supervisor
> C/W MARS Inc.
> 67 Millbrook Street, Suite 201
> Worcester, MA
> tel: 508-755-3323 ext. 325 <(508)%20755-3323>
> fax: 508-757-7801 <(508)%20757-7801>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Evergreen-catalogers mailing list
> Evergreen-catalogers at list.evergreen-ils.org
> http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
> evergreen-catalogers
>
>

-- 
Sarah Childs
Technical Services Department Head
Hussey-Mayfield Memorial Public Library
250 North Fifth Street
Zionsville, IN 46077
317-873-3149 x13330
sarahc at zionsvillelibrary.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.evergreen-ils.org/pipermail/evergreen-catalogers/attachments/20171110/2fe54a15/attachment.html>