[Evergreen-catalogers] RDA marc fields

[Mary Llewellyn]

We keep ours. In fact we're using tag 347 for MP3s to create a custom index
for OPAC searching.

Mary


On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 5:22 PM Glen Modell <modellg at aadl.org> wrote:

> Hello, this is Glen at the Ann Arbor District Library.  We've been live
> with Evergreen for just over a year, and I have a question from one of our
> cataloguers.  Formerly, we deleted RDA fields from MARC records because our
> previous system couldn't handle them.  But we are not seeing problems with
> RDA fields in Evergreen, so we'd like to leave those fields in.  Does
> anyone know of a reason we shouldn't keep them?  Thanks.
>
> *****************************
> Glen Modell
> Library Automation Specialist
> Ann Arbor District Library
> modellg at aadl.org
> 734-327-8322
> _______________________________________________
> Evergreen-catalogers mailing list
> Evergreen-catalogers at list.evergreen-ils.org
> http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/evergreen-catalogers
>


-- 
Mary Llewellyn
Database Manager
Bibliomation, Inc.
24 Wooster Ave.
Waterbury, CT 06708
mllewell at biblio.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.evergreen-ils.org/pipermail/evergreen-catalogers/attachments/20190206/64c440c6/attachment.html>