[Evergreen-catalogers] bibliographic record notes

[Elaine Hardy]

We did not implement them. We didn't see a use case that would be used in
PINES.

Our 500 notes display in the OPAC when the more details button is clicked.
There is valuable info in 500 notes, often.

J. Elaine Hardy, PINES and Collaborative Projects Manager
------------------------------

Georgia Public Library Service

2872 Woodcock Blvd., Suite 250 | Atlanta, GA 30341

(404) 235-7128 | ehardy at georgialibraries.org

(404) 548-4241 | Cell

<https://www.facebook.com/georgialibraries>
<https://www.twitter.com/georgialibs>
<https://www.instagram.com/georgialibraries/>

Join our email list <http://georgialibraries.org/subscription> for stories
of Georgia libraries making an impact in our communities.


It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live
near him. *— J.R.R. Tolkien*



On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 6:03 PM Mary Llewellyn via Evergreen-catalogers <
evergreen-catalogers at list.evergreen-ils.org> wrote:

> Hi Jennifer,
>
> Thanks for the explanation. I'm not certain we'll make use of them. For
> one thing, the staff would need to know to read the note for the
> instructions to use a monograph part, and the tab doesn't seem to draw
> attention to itself that a note is present.
>
> Mary
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 5:33 PM Jennifer Weston <
> jennifer.weston at equinoxoli.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Mary,
>>
>> The bib record notes outside of MARC are used on the server side during
>> migration projects or data projects. By making them visible through the
>> Staff UI, it just provides more transparency for this kind of notation.
>> Also, I like that they are not visible to the patron (like marc 500 tags)
>> so you can add a helpful note to a bib record just for staff -- for
>> example, "This record is used for all annual editions of the
>> cross-reference directory; please do not create a new one" or "Monograph
>> parts are required on this record"
>>
>> Also, I believe they can be used in reports so they could work like a
>> stat cat for bib records with a little consortial coordination as needed. I
>> want to check on that report suggestion, though. I'll let you know what I
>> discover.
>>
>> I would be curious to see if anyone else has creative ideas for using bib
>> record notes.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jennifer
>>
>> Jennifer Weston, MLIS
>> Product and Education Specialist
>> Equinox Open Library Initiative
>> jennifer.weston at equinoxOLI.org <jennifer.weston at equinoxoli.org>
>> *https://equinoxOLI.org <https://equinoxOLI.org>*
>> phone:  877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
>> direct:  770-709-5574
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 5:11 PM Mary Llewellyn via Evergreen-catalogers <
>> evergreen-catalogers at list.evergreen-ils.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> We've installed 3.8 on a test server here, and I'm going through new
>>> features. I've read the release notes, but I'm unclear on the why of
>>> bibliographic record notes. They are clearly outside the MARC record, but I
>>> can't figure out what they would be used for. Can anyone give me a use case
>>> example?
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> Mary
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Mary Llewellyn
>>> Database Manager
>>> Bibliomation, Inc.
>>> 24 Wooster Ave.
>>> Waterbury, CT 06708
>>> mllewell at biblio.org
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Evergreen-catalogers mailing list
>>> Evergreen-catalogers at list.evergreen-ils.org
>>>
>>> http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/evergreen-catalogers
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Mary Llewellyn
> Database Manager
> Bibliomation, Inc.
> 24 Wooster Ave.
> Waterbury, CT 06708
> mllewell at biblio.org
> _______________________________________________
> Evergreen-catalogers mailing list
> Evergreen-catalogers at list.evergreen-ils.org
> http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/evergreen-catalogers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.evergreen-ils.org/pipermail/evergreen-catalogers/attachments/20220310/a3288786/attachment-0001.htm>