[OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION] Test server for 2.1 (was: DIG Meeting Follow-up)

[Lori Bowen Ayre]

Okay then, let's coordinate.  I know Brian is currently hosting two
versions.  I've asked him to keep one semi-bleeding but maybe it isn't as
bleeding edge as you need.  Also one with the most current stable release.
 And we're willing to provide either of these versions to someone for
testing (in addition to what we keep up for demo purposes).

I want to make sure our efforts aren't wasted but I'm not sure how best to
get guidance.  Maybe there is more going on than this thread?  Is the IRC
where its at for this?

Help us be helpful please.

Lori


On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Dan Scott <dan at coffeecode.net> wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 12:53:02PM -0700, Lori Bowen Ayre wrote:
> > How many test servers do we need?
> >
> > Lori
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Wolf Halton <wolf.halton at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Y'all,
> > >
> > > Lyrasis would like to offer a pro bono test server for beta testing.
> > > What are the resource requirements?
> > >
> > > Wolf
>
> Well... as many as there are different and incompatible needs?
>
> For example, Jeff Godin asked in the #evergreen channel today whether
> there was a publicly available server offering the Template Toolkit OPAC
> interface because he was interested in doing a performance comparison
> between the JSPAC and the TPAC. The TPAC does not run on Evergreen 2.1,
> so a "bleeding-edge" server that could be used for testing and early
> documentation of features in development could be a useful contribution
> to the community. Having it scripted so that it reinstalled itself with
> a fresh checkout of OpenSRF and Evergreen and loaded a base set of data
> would also serve as a nice early warning system.
>
> Right now I think there's room for the following supported releases:
>
>  * 1.6.1.x
>  * 2.0.x
>
> And the forthcoming next stable release:
>
>  * 2.1.*
>
> As well as the bleeding edge:
>
>  * master
>
> I can't guarantee that the servers would get tons of use; I concur with
> Robert that many of us are running our own development environments -
> but I do see a use case.
> _______________________________________________
> OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION mailing list
> OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION at list.georgialibraries.org
> http://list.georgialibraries.org/mailman/listinfo/open-ils-documentation
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.georgialibraries.org/pipermail/open-ils-documentation/attachments/20110913/1061a3cb/attachment-0001.htm>