[OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION] Test server for 2.1 (was: DIG Meeting Follow-up)

[Wolf Halton]

Yes, let's coordinate something.
We have 2 demos set up in multi-server and stand-alone flavours of stable
release.
I like bleeding-edge I would like to take on the master - do you want to run
that on Ubuntu11.10Beta?    I have one test box running that already, though
we don't use anything as unstable as that for production.

On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Lori Bowen Ayre <lori.ayre at galecia.com>wrote:

> Okay then, let's coordinate.  I know Brian is currently hosting two
> versions.  I've asked him to keep one semi-bleeding but maybe it isn't as
> bleeding edge as you need.  Also one with the most current stable release.
>  And we're willing to provide either of these versions to someone for
> testing (in addition to what we keep up for demo purposes).
>
> I want to make sure our efforts aren't wasted but I'm not sure how best to
> get guidance.  Maybe there is more going on than this thread?  Is the IRC
> where its at for this?
>
> Help us be helpful please.
>
> Lori
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Dan Scott <dan at coffeecode.net> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 12:53:02PM -0700, Lori Bowen Ayre wrote:
>> > How many test servers do we need?
>> >
>> > Lori
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Wolf Halton <wolf.halton at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi Y'all,
>> > >
>> > > Lyrasis would like to offer a pro bono test server for beta testing.
>> > > What are the resource requirements?
>> > >
>> > > Wolf
>>
>> Well... as many as there are different and incompatible needs?
>>
>> For example, Jeff Godin asked in the #evergreen channel today whether
>> there was a publicly available server offering the Template Toolkit OPAC
>> interface because he was interested in doing a performance comparison
>> between the JSPAC and the TPAC. The TPAC does not run on Evergreen 2.1,
>> so a "bleeding-edge" server that could be used for testing and early
>> documentation of features in development could be a useful contribution
>> to the community. Having it scripted so that it reinstalled itself with
>> a fresh checkout of OpenSRF and Evergreen and loaded a base set of data
>> would also serve as a nice early warning system.
>>
>> Right now I think there's room for the following supported releases:
>>
>>  * 1.6.1.x
>>  * 2.0.x
>>
>> And the forthcoming next stable release:
>>
>>  * 2.1.*
>>
>> As well as the bleeding edge:
>>
>>  * master
>>
>> I can't guarantee that the servers would get tons of use; I concur with
>> Robert that many of us are running our own development environments -
>> but I do see a use case.
>> _______________________________________________
>> OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION mailing list
>> OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION at list.georgialibraries.org
>> http://list.georgialibraries.org/mailman/listinfo/open-ils-documentation
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION mailing list
> OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION at list.georgialibraries.org
> http://list.georgialibraries.org/mailman/listinfo/open-ils-documentation
>
>


-- 
This Apt Has Super Cow Powers - http://sourcefreedom.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.georgialibraries.org/pipermail/open-ils-documentation/attachments/20110913/fa974a5c/attachment.htm>