[OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION] DIG April monthly meeting minutes

[Soulliere, Robert]

Most of the kudos for the doc Google search should  go to Remington for doing most of the leg work and research to make the Google search happen.

There was one other item I wanted to bring up at the meeting related to the "Evergreen In Action" book available on Lulu.

Should it be retired from Lulu? A few arguments for retiring the book in Lulu:

1. It is available in other locations (FLOSS Manuals)

2. Content has been added to the official documentation and can be updated in the official docs.

3. It is not a bestseller and not generating a much money on Lulu.

4. It is based on version 2.3 which will not be a supported version.

Just to be clear... I am only suggesting retiring from the Lulu account. The book will still be available from other sources such as FLOSS Manuals.

Opinions?

Thanks,
Robert


Robert Soulliere, BA (Hons), MLIS
Digital Systems Librarian
Mohawk College Library
robert.soulliere at mohawkcollege.ca
Telephone: 905 575 1212 x3936
Fax: 905 575 2011

________________________________________
From: open-ils-documentation-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org [open-ils-documentation-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Yamil Suarez [ysuarez at berklee.edu]
Sent: April 10, 2014 4:50 PM
To: Documentation discussion for Evergreen software
Cc: Dan Wells
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION] DIG April monthly meeting minutes

On Apr 10, 2014, at 4:37 PM, Remington Steed <rjs7 at calvin.edu> wrote:

> Thanks Yamil for a great meeting today.
>
> First, since we skipped the "Updates from Content Coordinators", I wanted to make sure you all notice the good work of Robert Soulliere on the Docs website (new Google search box, new "report a problem" link in footer, etc.).  Thanks Robert!
>

Good job Robert, I had not noticed.

> Second, I have a few questions about the meeting agenda.  It seems like it keeps getting longer, and old stuff never really gets removed.  Are there items that can be removed to simplify things?  Are there items that need a decision to be made?  Since we decided today to focus on 2.6 features in the short term, should we prioritize the agenda with that near the top and agenda items about older docs moved lower?  Then when we finish the 2.6 features, that item can be removed and we can continue our workflow on older docs.  Just trying to simplify and focus our efforts for maximum progress.



I suspect that some items can be removed, but to be extremely safe I don't usually remove much. I would rather that the group decides and not just the person updating the agenda page.


Yamil


_______________________________________________
OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION mailing list
OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION at list.georgialibraries.org
http://list.georgialibraries.org/mailman/listinfo/open-ils-documentation

This E-mail contains privileged and confidential information intended
only for the individual or entity named in the message.  If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible
to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication
is prohibited.  If this communication was received in error, please
notify the sender by reply E-mail immediately, and delete and destroy
the original message.