[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Showing online resources in the OPAC

[Vicki Reeves]

Duhh!  I did not set the indicators to 4 and 0.  When I reread
instructions provided by list members I caught my error, set the
indicators and now they show in the OPAC.  Thank you.

On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 10:30 -0500, Vicki Reeves wrote:
> We're trying to figure out how to add records for electronic resources
> so that they will show in our OPAC.  We're on Evergreen 1.6.0.8
> 
> I tried adding the subfield 9 to my 856 field.  The resources are not
> showing in the opac and nothing is showing in the asset.URI areas of the
> database.  
> 
> This is the 856 for one of the resources:
> 856 3 Wildflowers of Southwest (Beauregard Parish) Louisiana
> 856 u http://library.beau.org/~lawild
> 856 2 http
> 856 9 DER
> 
> There are no holdings attached to the record.
> 
> Any thoughts as to what I need to do are welcome.
> 
> On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 18:23 -0400, Dan Scott wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 03:48:20PM -0400, Jason Etheridge wrote:
> > > > There is a bit of an explanation on cataloguing electronic resources  in the documentation here which explains the second method:
> > > > http://docs.evergreen-ils.org/1.6/draft/html/electronicresourcesvisible.html
> > 
> > Man that URL looks familiar...
> >  
> > > How important are the indicators here?  If they do need to be 4 and 0,
> > > we may want to emphasize that.
> > 
> > In 2.0+, 030.schema.metabib.sql says:
> > 
> >  uris := oils_xpath('//*[@tag="856" and (@ind1="4" or @ind1="1") and
> > (@ind2="0" or @ind2="1")]',marcxml);
> > 
> > So, ind1 can be "4" or "1", and ind2 can be "0" or "1". Mike relaxed
> > things after presumably finding that many MARC records don't strictly
> > follow the standard.
> > 
> > 1.6+ matches that flexibility, albeit in OpenILS::Application::Ingest.pm
> > instead.