[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Holds placed prior to status change
Sarah Childs
sarahc at zionsville.lib.in.us
Thu Feb 27 11:19:34 EST 2014
This is our process as well. Also, we don't use acquisitions yet, but
if we have a request for an item, we add an on order record so that the
holds can be placed. This way we don't get a pile up of patron request
slips for popular items.
---
Sarah Childs
Technical Services Department Head
Hussey-Mayfield Memorial Public Library
250 North Fifth Street
Zionsville, IN 46077
317-873-3149 x13330
sarahc at zionsville.lib.in.us
On 2014-02-27 09:52, Lynn Floyd wrote:
> We generally add the titles before release date, and keep them in the
> In-processing status. This allows the holds to be placed, but the
> title is
> technically unavailable. Then release date, we check them all in and
> capture the holds. We generally do it this way because of the amount
> of
> titles in general we catalog. Also patrons then can place their own
> holds on
> the title, when it shows up in the catalog.
>
>
>
> Lynn Floyd
> lfloyd at andersonlibrary.org
> Anderson County Library
> 864-260-4500 x181
> http://www.andersonlibrary.org <http://www.andersonlibrary.org/>
>
>
>
>
> From: open-ils-general-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org
> [mailto:open-ils-general-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf
> Of
> Elisabeth Keppler
> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 9:46 AM
> To: Evergreen Discussion Group
> Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Holds placed prior to status change
>
>
>
> Thanks, everyone. I really appreciate how generous Evergreen
> librarians are
> with their knowledge and experience!
>
>
>
> Out of curiosity, is it common practice out there to add hot new
> titles to
> the catalog the day before their lay-down date so that holds can be
> filled
> as soon as a title is released? We have patrons who call first thing
> on
> Tuesdays (mostly) to ask why their hold on the latest bestseller
> hasn't been
> filled yet. If we add items on lay-down day and stash them in the
> back for
> 24 hours, they'll scream.
>
>
>
> Lise Keppler
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Laurie Love <LLove at arlibrary.org>
> wrote:
>
> Lise:
>
> I'm part of the NC Cardinal system also and Wilkes (Appalachian
> Regional) has been with Evergreen since 2011. If you ever want to
> call or
> email me with questions, I'm happy to try to help. The holds are
> really
> tricky with Evergreen and there are lots of foibles. The "Find
> another
> Target" is supposed to look for another title to satisfy the hold.
> Doesn't
> always work in my experience though.
>
> Laurie Love
>
> Circ. Mgr.
>
> Wilkes County Public Library
>
> llove at arlibrary.org
>
> 336-838-2818
>
>
>
> From: open-ils-general-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org
> [mailto:open-ils-general-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf
> Of
> Elisabeth Keppler
> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 9:05 AM
> To: Evergreen Discussion Group
> Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Holds placed prior to status change
>
>
>
> We're new to Evergreen and have been struggling with holds on new
> items.
> We've had issues with Find Another Target messing up the holds queue,
> but we
> may have been doing it incorrectly.
>
>
>
> When you say to "Find Another Target for the hold on top of the
> queue",
> Tina, do you mean the first hold that appears when we click on View
> Holds
> for the record? This seems to be the newest hold and might not be for
> our
> library's patron. (We're in the NC Cardinal consortium. Since we use
> 6-month age hold protection, holds outside Forsyth County won't be
> filled by
> new items we add here.) We tried filtering to holds for just the
> branch
> where the new item was added, but that seems to have caused problems.
> Would
> you mind elaborating on your recommendation?
>
>
>
> Thanks very much,
>
> Lise Keppler
>
> Forsyth County Public Library
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Tina Ji (Project Sitka)
> <tji at sitka.bclibraries.ca> wrote:
>
> Hi Deana,
>
> If your 'missing' and 'trace' statuses are non-holdable, this is
> probably
> the expected behaviour. We experience the same thing with our hold
> targeter
> running every 15 mins for new holds (placed within 24 hours) and daily
> for
> old holds (placed 24 hours ago). So new holds may be targeted by a
> copy with
> newly achieved holdable status, but not the old ones.
>
> The opportunistic capture is related to the hold_copy_map, which is
> updated
> by the hold targeter, thus updated daily for old holds. Items with
> newly
> achieved holdable status is not in that table for old holds.
>
> We advise our sites doing Find Another Target for the hold on top of
> the
> queue or waiting for a day. The checkin modifier: Retarget Local Hold
> may
> help, to some extent.
>
>
>
> Tina
>
>
>
>
> Quoting Deana Cunningham <deana.cunningham at granvillecounty.org>:
>
> Hi great brain!
>
> I was playing around today on our test server and have a question
> about
> hold triggering. After an item has a status change to "missing" or
> "trace",
> any holds placed prior to that change are not getting triggered upon
> item
> check in. I have tried checking the item in numerous times (to see if
> maybe
> the first time when it changes the status back to "reshelving" it
> would
> activate the hold for capture at the next check in, but it did not.
> Placing
> a new hold on the item after the status has been changed back to
> "reshelving" causes that hold to be triggered on subsequent check
> ins, but
> the hold placed before changing to "trace" or "missing" is not
> triggered.
>
> Something I'm missing here?
>
> I also realize the item should be caught during the regular "check
> for
> holds" cron job (which is another problem we're having) but I am only
> looking at opportunistic hold capturing right now.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Deana
>
> Deana Cunningham
> Branch Manager, South Branch Library
> 1550 S. Campus Dr.
> Creedmoor, NC 27522
> Phone: (919) 528-1752 <tel:%28919%29%20528-1752>
> Fax: (919) 528-1376 <tel:%28919%29%20528-1376>
> deana.cunningham at granvillecounty.org
>
>
>
> Tina Ji
> 1-888-848-9250
> Trainer/Help Desk Specialist
> BC Libraries Cooperative/Sitka
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Lise Keppler
>
> Forsyth County Public Library
>
> 660 W 5th St
>
> Winston Salem NC 27101
>
> 336-703-3070
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Lise Keppler
>
> Forsyth County Public Library
>
> 660 W 5th St
>
> Winston Salem NC 27101
>
> 336-703-3070
More information about the Open-ils-general
mailing list