[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] browser client update 2014-05-01 / feedback requested on catalog integration

Bill Erickson berick at esilibrary.com
Thu May 1 17:00:26 EDT 2014


I thought this sounded familiar.  Thanks to Erica Rohlfs for showing me the
way...

https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1084753

http://evergreen-ils.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=dev:opac:template-toolkit:plan&#jspac_features_missing_from_tpac

-b



On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Hardy, Elaine
<ehardy at georgialibraries.org>wrote:

> Bill,
>
>
>
> At one point, there was a list of missing features in the TPAC that the
> community wanted back. I am fairly sure the color coding of records was one
> of them. Was the list not transferred to Launchpad at some point if it is
> not being maintained? I have not been able to locate the list on the wiki..
>
>
>
> I did
>
>
>
> *Elaine*
>
> J. Elaine Hardy
> PINES & Collaborative Projects Manager
> Georgia Public Library Service
> 1800 Century Place, Ste 150
> Atlanta, Ga. 30345-4304
>
> 404.235-7128
> 404.235-7201, fax
> ehardy at georgialibraries.org
> www.georgialibraries.org
> www.georgialibraries.org/pines
>
> *From:* open-ils-general-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org [mailto:
> open-ils-general-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org] *On Behalf Of *Bill
> Erickson
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 01, 2014 3:42 PM
> *To:* Evergreen Discussion Group
> *Subject:* Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] browser client update 2014-05-01 /
> feedback requested on catalog integration
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 2:53 PM, McCanna, Terran <
> tmccanna at georgialibraries.org> wrote:
>
> More thoughts on catalog integration...
>
> - All the feedback I've received from our staff so far express a strong
> preference to keeping the catalog view that is in the staff client as close
> as possible to the public OPAC view.
>
>
>
> Duly noted.
>
>
>
>
> - Although you're not working on the cataloging phase yet, catalogers
> switch back and forth between the MARC view and the catalog view of a bib
> record when creating it / working on it to make sure it will display
> properly when patrons view it through the OPAC, so please keep that in mind.
>
>
>
> Do we see this as materially different from having the MARC view open in
> one browser tab and the catalog view open in another?
>
>
>
>
> - Staff say that in an older version of the staff client, there used to be
> visual cues on the search results to indicate when a bib record was hidden
> from the public view (because it had no copies attached, because all copies
> were lost or missing, etc.) so that staff could readily tell what they were
> seeing that patrons could not see. This was lost in one of the upgrades. Is
> that something that can be re-enabled for the browser client?
>
>
>
> I would suggest opening a LP ticket for this, if there isn't already one,
> since it's (presumably) a feature that was lost with the move to TPAC.
>
>
>
> Thanks, Terran.
>
>
>
> -b
>
>
>
> --
>
> Bill Erickson
>
> | Senior Software Developer
>
> | phone: 877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
>
> | email: berick at esilibrary.com
>
> | web: http://esilibrary.com
>
> | Equinox Software, Inc. / The Open Source Experts
>
>
>



-- 
Bill Erickson
| Senior Software Developer
| phone: 877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
| email: berick at esilibrary.com
| web: http://esilibrary.com
| Equinox Software, Inc. / The Open Source Experts
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://libmail.georgialibraries.org/pipermail/open-ils-general/attachments/20140501/8a2d6189/attachment.htm>


More information about the Open-ils-general mailing list