[Evergreen-acq] direct charges

[Martha Crawley]

We tried that and experienced the same problem so we stopped. Would love to see it get fixed so we could use it.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 25, 2018, at 4:44 PM, "evergreen-acq-request at list.evergreen-ils.org" <evergreen-acq-request at list.evergreen-ils.org> wrote:
> 
> Send Evergreen-acq mailing list submissions to
>    evergreen-acq at list.evergreen-ils.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>    http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/evergreen-acq
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>    evergreen-acq-request at list.evergreen-ils.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>    evergreen-acq-owner at list.evergreen-ils.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Evergreen-acq digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. Direct charges on POs (Tiffany Little)
>   2. Re: Direct charges on POs (Raquel Jeffreys)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 16:24:20 -0400
> From: Tiffany Little <tlittle at georgialibraries.org>
> To: Evergreen ACQ Listserv <evergreen-acq at list.evergreen-ils.org>
> Subject: [Evergreen-acq] Direct charges on POs
> Message-ID:
>    <CABT_fJxHrQYdbXACmHvGbqLE=dVHKz-CUEUkUJtBVxdKwHAs9Q at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> Good afternoon,
> 
> Is anyone out there encumbering processing/cataloging charges on their
> purchase orders? We have one library that is doing this, but they run into
> the issue outlined in this LP bug:
> 
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1709472
> 
> Basically until they completely remove the direct charge on the PO they're
> being double-billed, as the charge is on both the PO and the invoice. There
> is no link between them to reduce the PO's direct charge in proportion to
> the direct charges on the invoice.
> 
> Has anyone found a workaround for this, or do you just not encumber
> processing/cataloging on your purchase orders?
> 
> Thanks!
> Tiffany
> 
> --
> Tiffany Little
> *PINES Services Specialist, Acquisitions*
> Georgia Public Library Service
> 1800 Century Place NE, Suite 150
> Atlanta, Georgia 30345
> (470) 512-1454
> tlittle at georgialibraries.org
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://list.evergreen-ils.org/pipermail/evergreen-acq/attachments/20180425/442a9d5a/attachment-0001.html>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 16:43:48 -0400
> From: "Raquel Jeffreys" <jeffreysr at mail.henry.public.lib.ga.us>
> To: "'Discussion of acquisitions in Evergreen'"
>    <evergreen-acq at list.evergreen-ils.org>
> Subject: Re: [Evergreen-acq] Direct charges on POs
> Message-ID:
>    <008c01d3dcd6$1c936490$55ba2db0$@mail.henry.public.lib.ga.us>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> We, at HCLS, have not experienced this problem so no need for a workaround for us.  Our POs appear to be just fine.
> 
> 
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> 
> 
> Raquel Jeffreys-McCray
> 
> Acquisitions Assistant
> 
> Henry County Library System
> 
> 1001 Florence McGarity Blvd
> 
> McDonough, GA 30252
> 
> 678-216-0806 (Business)
> 
> 678-432-6153 (Fax)
> 
> <mailto:jeffreysr at mail.henry.public.lib.ga.us> jeffreysr at mail.henry.public.lib.ga.us
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: Evergreen-acq <evergreen-acq-bounces at list.evergreen-ils.org> On Behalf Of Tiffany Little
> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2018 4:24 PM
> To: Evergreen ACQ Listserv <evergreen-acq at list.evergreen-ils.org>
> Subject: [Evergreen-acq] Direct charges on POs
> 
> 
> 
> Good afternoon,
> 
> 
> 
> Is anyone out there encumbering processing/cataloging charges on their purchase orders? We have one library that is doing this, but they run into the issue outlined in this LP bug: 
> 
> 
> 
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1709472
> 
> 
> 
> Basically until they completely remove the direct charge on the PO they're being double-billed, as the charge is on both the PO and the invoice. There is no link between them to reduce the PO's direct charge in proportion to the direct charges on the invoice.
> 
> 
> 
> Has anyone found a workaround for this, or do you just not encumber processing/cataloging on your purchase orders?
> 
> 
> Thanks!
> Tiffany
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 
> Tiffany Little
> 
> PINES Services Specialist, Acquisitions
> 
> Georgia Public Library Service
> 
> 1800 Century Place NE, Suite 150
> 
> Atlanta, Georgia 30345
> 
> (470) 512-1454
> 
> tlittle at georgialibraries.org <mailto:tlittle at georgialibraries.org> 
> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://list.evergreen-ils.org/pipermail/evergreen-acq/attachments/20180425/d4b75dd7/attachment.html>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: image001.png
> Type: image/png
> Size: 14545 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL: <http://list.evergreen-ils.org/pipermail/evergreen-acq/attachments/20180425/d4b75dd7/attachment.png>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Subject: Digest Footer
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Evergreen-acq mailing list
> Evergreen-acq at list.evergreen-ils.org
> http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/evergreen-acq
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> End of Evergreen-acq Digest, Vol 6, Issue 2
> *******************************************